Quote (fender @ Dec 31 2020 08:19pm)
it's not 'retroactively changing the rules', not a 'breach of contract' though, please stop it with the kitchen sink lawyering. if they had done it without the new strain, fair enough, you'd have a point, but that was a completely new development for which there weren't any rules in place. when you're on vacation and police tries to arrest you for a crime for example, you can't just go "i only agreed to having a good time when i came to this country, i'm here on my holiday. arresting me would be a breach of contract. tough luck, bitches". there was no "betrayal" or "bending over" involved. those people should have known that traveling during a fucking pandemic has its risks and inconveniences.
them being able to travel abroad in the first place was stupid imo, but again, not illegal. i'm pretty sure swiss tourism officials also weren't too happy about the measure, but what it comes down to is that they were implemented as an attempt to prevent the uncontrolled spread of a potentially dangerous new strain. the implementation, the execution, the severity of those measures... all that leaves plenty of room for discussion and criticism. generally speaking, nothing that happened in europe as response to covid-19 has been 'perfect', especially with the benefit of hindsight. that does, however, not take away responsibility or blame from those asshats. was it a shitty situation for them? sure, but that does not justify their actions. trying to blame the swiss government while expressing sympathy for those selfish fucks is ridiculous imo.
You don't get to invite people to spend money in your country, accept the money, and then refuse to give them the vacation you promised.
The Swiss actively promoted and condoned a service. The Swiss government should have done the responsible thing and immediately refunded the trips at Swiss expense.