Quote (Black XistenZ @ Dec 5 2019 11:20am)
It doesnt. From a legal standpoint, he is surely entitled to sue them. But as you said: what this case will really come down to is whether the prosecutors falsified evidence, not what the Martins were doing. And there wont be any notable compensation sum to be won from the Martins either, from a financial standpoint, it will also come down to GZ vs the authorities.
So him including the Martins in his lawsuit makes no real sense when you think about it, but is likely to hurt them on an emotional level, and to stoke a toxic public debate.
Again, he is entitled to sue the Martins. But it doesnt make too much sense, is completely tone-deaf and not something that a person with any basic level of human decency would do.
so the family providing old photos to push a false narrative doesnt involve the family?
or if it was a fake girlfriend and they sat by idly while she provided false testimony?
and do we really not think the family would be involved in choosing/grooming a false witness?
i'd need to revisit the testimony and media statements but they also covered up violent incidents, but that could only be to the media.
there's a real chance this was a criminally fraudulent collusion between family and prosecution. if the allegations are anywhere near true.