d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > Official Jan 6 Committee Thread
Prev14849505152225Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 21,485
Joined: Jul 21 2005
Gold: 843.40
Aug 14 2021 11:09am
Quote (thundercock @ 14 Aug 2021 09:50)
Unless the pictures she had were of naked children, she wasn't arrested FOR that.

If I posted the exact same pictures, do you think I'd be arrested too?


Dunno. Grab some screenshots from some of the video, post them on your social media claiming you took the "pictures" on the 6th. Let's find out. :)
Member
Posts: 35,291
Joined: Aug 17 2004
Gold: 12,730.67
Aug 14 2021 11:45am
Quote (InsaneBobb @ Aug 14 2021 10:09am)
Dunno. Grab some screenshots from some of the video, post them on your social media claiming you took the "pictures" on the 6th. Let's find out. :)


You and I both know that if I made that claim, I wouldn't be arrested. Do you know why? Because that's not why SHE was arrested. :)

She was arrested because those pictures were evidence of her committing a crime. :D

She was arrested FOR being in a place she had no right being in. :lol:
Member
Posts: 21,485
Joined: Jul 21 2005
Gold: 843.40
Aug 14 2021 11:50am
Quote (thundercock @ 14 Aug 2021 10:45)
You and I both know that if I made that claim, I wouldn't be arrested. Do you know why? Because that's not why SHE was arrested. :)

She was arrested because those pictures were evidence of her committing a crime. :D

She was arrested FOR being in a place she had no right being in. :lol:


So what you're saying is that if you posted those pictures claiming you took them, you would be arrested, because you posted pictures, correct?

So, as it turns out, she was arrested for taking pictures. Had she not published her pictures to social media, she would not have been arrested.

As I said, it's pretty sad when even TiStuff has outthought you. At any rate, I'll leave you to troll in peace for a while. :angel:
Member
Posts: 35,291
Joined: Aug 17 2004
Gold: 12,730.67
Aug 14 2021 12:20pm
Quote (InsaneBobb @ Aug 14 2021 10:50am)
So what you're saying is that if you posted those pictures claiming you took them, you would be arrested, because you posted pictures, correct?

So, as it turns out, she was arrested for taking pictures. Had she not published her pictures to social media, she would not have been arrested.

As I said, it's pretty sad when even TiStuff has outthought you. At any rate, I'll leave you to troll in peace for a while. :angel:


No...I literally said the opposite. Notice how I explicitly said that I wouldn't be arrested.

I agree that if she didn't post evidence of her committing a crime it's quite unlikely that she'd be arrested. If someone ELSE posted a picture of her there and she wasn't taking pictures...she still would have been arrested and charged with the exact same crime. Do you know why? Because she wasn't arrested FOR taking pictures.

If I murder someone and there's no evidence that I committed the crime, it's also unlikely that I'd be arrested. If I post a picture of myself with a bloody knife next to a dead body, I'm not arrested for taking a selfie.

Lay off the sauce Bob, it ain't healthy.
Member
Posts: 27,048
Joined: Dec 21 2007
Gold: 14,569.69
Aug 14 2021 02:26pm
Quote (InsaneBobb @ Aug 14 2021 10:50am)
So what you're saying is that if you posted those pictures claiming you took them, you would be arrested, because you posted pictures, correct?

So, as it turns out, she was arrested for taking pictures. Had she not published her pictures to social media, she would not have been arrested.

As I said, it's pretty sad when even TiStuff has outthought you. At any rate, I'll leave you to troll in peace for a while. :angel:



Simple question was she charged/convicted or arrested for taking photos. Yes or no.
eZ gg no re

This post was edited by theCrossbones on Aug 14 2021 02:31pm
Member
Posts: 21,485
Joined: Jul 21 2005
Gold: 843.40
Aug 14 2021 02:39pm
Quote (theCrossbones @ 14 Aug 2021 13:26)
Simple question was she charged/convicted or arrested for taking photos. Yes or no.
eZ gg no re


She was arrested for the photos she took. So yes. Which part of this is confusing to you? Once again:

Quote (TiStuff @ 14 Aug 2021 09:02)
sounds like she took pictures

sounds like if she didnt take pics she would of been ok

sounds like a leftie fraud hustle

proud days for the FBI


TiStuff has outthought you. That's impressive. :)
Member
Posts: 27,048
Joined: Dec 21 2007
Gold: 14,569.69
Aug 14 2021 02:42pm
Quote (InsaneBobb @ Aug 14 2021 01:39pm)
She was arrested for the photos she took. So yes. Which part of this is confusing to you? Once again:



TiStuff has outthought you. That's impressive. :)



No she proved evidence to being part of crime. Taking a picture is not a crime god damn. Give it up… funny and sad you think your proving some point besides you have lost your mind
Member
Posts: 21,485
Joined: Jul 21 2005
Gold: 843.40
Aug 14 2021 02:45pm
Quote (theCrossbones @ 14 Aug 2021 13:42)
No she proved evidence to being part of crime. Taking a picture is not a crime god damn. Give it up… funny and sad you think your proving some point besides you have lost your mind


LOL, you're so fucking stupid it's almost not funny.

Self-incrimination is not a thing. Have you heard of the fifth amendment? Did the fucking FBI have a warrant to search the private pictures and words of this person to enter into court testimony?

Due process was not observed. Why was it not observed? Pictures. Why pictures? The pictures proved she was at a location on a day. So... Why was she arrested? Because she took pictures, and the 5th amendment doesn't apply the moment computers are involved. :)
Member
Posts: 27,048
Joined: Dec 21 2007
Gold: 14,569.69
Aug 14 2021 02:49pm
Quote (InsaneBobb @ Aug 14 2021 01:45pm)
LOL, you're so fucking stupid it's almost not funny.

Self-incrimination is not a thing. Have you heard of the fifth amendment? Did the fucking FBI have a warrant to search the private pictures and words of this person to enter into court testimony?

Due process was not observed. Why was it not observed? Pictures. Why pictures? The pictures proved she was at a location on a day. So... Why was she arrested? Because she took pictures, and the 5th amendment doesn't apply the moment computers are involved. :)



So any two bit lawyer could have defended her? Sad your still wrong
Send me a link to these stupid ass pictures that you can’t figure out. I’ll post them. Bet you 100k I don’t go to jail.
Bet?
What a waste of alcohol. Do something constructive with you buzz

This post was edited by theCrossbones on Aug 14 2021 02:53pm
Member
Posts: 21,485
Joined: Jul 21 2005
Gold: 843.40
Aug 14 2021 02:58pm
Quote (theCrossbones @ 14 Aug 2021 13:49)
So any two bit lawyer could have defended her? Sad your still wrong
Send me a link to these stupid ass pictures that you can’t figure out. I’ll post them. Bet you 100k I don’t go to jail.
Bet?
What a waste of alcohol. Do something constructive with you buzz


Are you high? Put the pipe down. I told you, go grab any of the videos from the 6th of January. Pull some screenshots. Post them to your social media with simple comments of, "Check the pics I took of the revolution!"

Do it. Show us that the pictures alone won't get you arrested. Feel free to post here the link once you've done so. :)
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev14849505152225Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll