Quote (Surfpunk @ 16 Nov 2019 20:31)
If Trump wanted to get a handle on corruption, why would he sack an Ambassador who was strongly anti-corruption?
And if Ukraine is supposedly one of the three most corrupt countries in the world, why would Trump (or anyone) trust them to be able to investigate Biden properly?
Yovanovitch was characterized as "strong on corruption" based on what, and by whom?
The thing with investigations in Ukraine is not as complicated as it seems. Corruption in the country isnt wild and unpredictable, it largely goes along certain lines. Before the euromaidan, the country's economy and riches were divided among a clique of pro-russian oligarchs. After euromaidan, these pro-russian oligarchs were replaced by equally corrupt pro-western oligarchs, headed by then president Petro Poroshenko. And since the election of Zelensky, he is trying to push back these corrupt "2nd wave" oligarchs as well. If he has genuinely good intentions or just wants to replace them by yet another round of oligarchs under his control remains to be seen. But there is little doubt that he has no loyalty to or sympathy for the corrupt people from the 2014-2018 years.
This post was edited by Black XistenZ on Nov 16 2019 01:43pm