d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > Russia / Ukraine
Prev1486548664867486848695001Next
Closed New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 50,749
Joined: Jan 20 2010
Gold: 5,146.00
Apr 19 2025 04:13pm
On a serious note I believe our German bros can do the funniest thing ever and get those propaganda editors fired.

This is official Deutsche Welle channel. Public display of Nazi symbols is a punishable offense in Germany.


It says something if child soldiering is a-okay but nazi child soldiering isn't
Member
Posts: 34,835
Joined: May 16 2024
Gold: 0.00
Apr 20 2025 01:33am


Jesus Christ...
Member
Posts: 56,312
Joined: Jan 19 2007
Gold: 575,268.61
Apr 20 2025 01:58am
Basically in democracy politicians need to please the people, because they dont get elected if they dont.
But you dont have to be democratic to be a good ruler, there are some exceptions, like Singapore, where autocratic regime actually pleases its people.
Americans are rich people, I think its the richest nation in the world, at least among the bigger ones.
Russia? See below.

strap in, because life in poor, remote Russia is **a whole different level of grim**.
This ain't the Moscow you see on tourist brochures — it's **bare survival mode** for a lot of people.

---

### 1. **Poverty That Smells Like Rust and Rot**

In places like:
- rural **Siberia**,
- abandoned mining towns in the **Far East**,
- poor villages in **Dagestan** or **Buryatia**,

**life is brutal**.
People often live in **half-collapsed Soviet-era buildings**, with:
- broken windows patched with plastic,
- no proper heating (only old coal stoves if they’re lucky),
- muddy roads that turn into **lakes of shit** when it rains.

Most houses have no proper plumbing. Some areas don’t even have constant electricity — **blackouts are just part of life**.

**Example:**
Go to some parts of the Kemerovo Oblast (Siberian coal region) — you'll find villages where **kids walk 5 kilometers through snow** just to get to a half-functional school that hasn't seen renovation since Brezhnev was alive.

---

### 2. **Healthcare is a Fucking Joke**

- Hospitals are falling apart.
- There’s often **no ambulance** service (or it’s a 2-hour wait... if the car even has fuel).
- Medicine shortages are normal.
- If you need surgery or treatment for serious diseases?
Good luck, bro. You either travel to a big city (which you probably can’t afford) or **you die at home**.

**Example:**
In many remote towns, they’ve straight-up **shut down maternity wards**.
Pregnant women have to **drive hundreds of kilometers** to give birth — and sometimes they don’t make it in time.

---

### 3. **Alcohol, Drugs, and Suicide**

When every day feels the same and there's **no future in sight**, people turn to:
- **homemade booze** (samogon),
- **cheap vodka** (sometimes fake, poisonous shit),
- **hard drugs** like krokodil (yes, the one that **rots your flesh**).

Suicide rates, especially among men, are **shockingly high** in these areas.

**Example:**
In certain regions like Chukotka or the Komi Republic, male life expectancy drops to **early 50s**.
That’s the same range as some of the poorest African countries, just colder and drunker.

---

### 4. **Jobs? What Jobs?**

Most industries collapsed after the Soviet Union fell.
What’s left:
- scrap metal scavenging,
- illegal logging,
- coal mining (for pennies and at huge health risks),
- government handouts that barely cover **cheap instant noodles**.

Young people **flee to Moscow or St. Petersburg** if they can — anyone left behind is usually:
- too old,
- too poor,
- or too tied down by family.

**Example:**
In some towns in the Arkhangelsk region, **the only "business" is the local post office and one tiny grocery store**. Everyone else is on welfare, hunting, fishing, or just scraping by.

---

### 5. **Police and Authorities?**
**Corrupt as fuck.**
- Cops don't protect — they **extort bribes**.
- Local officials pocket the money meant for infrastructure or welfare.
- Ordinary people have **zero trust** in the system.

If your house burns down because of faulty wiring?
**Tough shit.** Authorities will send "thoughts and prayers" — no real help.

---

### TL;DR:

Ordinary life in poor remote Russia is:
> **"You wake up cold, you eat what you can afford, you work yourself into an early grave, you drink to forget, and you pray nothing worse happens."**

People survive out of stubbornness, not because the system helps them.


There's a lot in your post, but based on your usual takes, it seems to boil down to: Russia bad, USA good. No doubt, life in parts of Russia is incredibly harsh. But if we’re playing that game, the US has plenty of its own dysfunction — a full-blown culture war, a broken healthcare system, rising crime, mass homelessness, and growing political extremism. And it’s not like Poland is immune to problems either. Millions have left over the decades because there were no prospects — many of them now live here in Ireland. So poverty and hardship aren’t unique to Russia. But all of this sidesteps the real issue. We’re not debating who has the worst infrastructure — we’re protesting against the stupidity of the US in crossing Russia's red line, in seeking to use Ukraine as a foil to destroy Russia and in ever seeking to escalate this war, such that before Trump was in office we had Russia seriously considering nuking Ukraine.

so by all means, continue to cheer lead for more war but then you have to also accept the consequences.

This post was edited by ferdia on Apr 20 2025 01:59am
Member
Posts: 39,650
Joined: Nov 16 2005
Gold: 13.37
Apr 20 2025 03:47am
There's a lot in your post, but based on your usual takes, it seems to boil down to: Russia bad, USA good. No doubt, life in parts of Russia is incredibly harsh. But if we’re playing that game, the US has plenty of its own dysfunction — a full-blown culture war, a broken healthcare system, rising crime, mass homelessness, and growing political extremism. And it’s not like Poland is immune to problems either. Millions have left over the decades because there were no prospects — many of them now live here in Ireland. So poverty and hardship aren’t unique to Russia. But all of this sidesteps the real issue. We’re not debating who has the worst infrastructure — we’re protesting against the stupidity of the US in crossing Russia's red line, in seeking to use Ukraine as a foil to destroy Russia and in ever seeking to escalate this war, such that before Trump was in office we had Russia seriously considering nuking Ukraine.

so by all means, continue to cheer lead for more war but then you have to also accept the consequences.


Try asking how many citizens live in such villages- it would be interesting to see if they even make up 1% of the total population. You could also ask whether it’s cost-effective to stretch a gas pipeline for a hundred kilometers just for 2-3 people :) But those are details. The weird GPT of Ironfister is swearing like a sailor. So you could also ask whether the AI is just trying to please the user based on their query history instead of citing sources.
Member
Posts: 16,411
Joined: Apr 9 2007
Gold: 12,059.17
Apr 20 2025 04:03am
There's a lot in your post, but based on your usual takes, it seems to boil down to: Russia bad, USA good. No doubt, life in parts of Russia is incredibly harsh. But if we’re playing that game, the US has plenty of its own dysfunction — a full-blown culture war, a broken healthcare system, rising crime, mass homelessness, and growing political extremism. And it’s not like Poland is immune to problems either. Millions have left over the decades because there were no prospects — many of them now live here in Ireland. So poverty and hardship aren’t unique to Russia. But all of this sidesteps the real issue. We’re not debating who has the worst infrastructure — we’re protesting against the stupidity of the US in crossing Russia's red line, in seeking to use Ukraine as a foil to destroy Russia and in ever seeking to escalate this war, such that before Trump was in office we had Russia seriously considering nuking Ukraine.

so by all means, continue to cheer lead for more war but then you have to also accept the consequences.


I do not cheer for war, but running away from the problem will not solve a problem.
Russia promised Ukraine to stay independent, and they broke the promise.
Russia can have peace anytime. They can even keep the lands they already conquered. A no-NATO deal for Ukraine could be negotiated, provided Ukraine gets some real peace guarantees.
But Russians dont want, they want more - more land, more slaves, they want to conquer whole Ukraine and then only god knows what will be their next target.
There is no military risk from Poland or Ireland or Ukraine or NATO to Russia, because people there do not want war. Especially not against Russia, USA can invade some evil desert regime but thats it.
So when Russia says they feel endangered, they are lying. At the same time they are encircling Europe via Africa.
If you start submitting to Russia demands, they simply keep asking for more and more. The way they took over my country in the 18th century: asked for some land, were given that, then they asked for more 5 or 10 years later.
Same story with Hitler, he was given Czechia, Austria etc, all to prevent war. Did this prevent WW2? No, it helped Hitler empire grow and better prepare for WW2.
How many times do we need to repeat the history?

happy easter people!
Member
Posts: 56,312
Joined: Jan 19 2007
Gold: 575,268.61
Apr 20 2025 04:07am
I do not cheer for war, but running away from the problem will not solve a problem.Russia promised Ukraine to stay independent, and they broke the promise.
Russia can have peace anytime. They can even keep the lands they already conquered. A no-NATO deal for Ukraine could be negotiated, provided Ukraine gets some real peace guarantees.
But Russians dont want, they want more - more land, more slaves, they want to conquer whole Ukraine and then only god knows what will be their next target.
There is no military risk from Poland or Ireland or Ukraine or NATO to Russia, because people there do not want war. Especially not against Russia, USA can invade some evil desert regime but thats it.
So when Russia says they feel endangered, they are lying. At the same time they are encircling Europe via Africa.
If you start submitting to Russia demands, they simply keep asking for more and more. The way they took over my country in the 18th century: asked for some land, were given that, then they asked for more 5 or 10 years later.
Same story with Hitler, he was given Czechia, Austria etc, all to prevent war. Did this prevent WW2? No, it helped Hitler empire grow and better prepare for WW2.
How many times do we need to repeat the history?

happy easter people!


But Ukraine put in its constitution a will NOT to be independent, to Join Nato. Its back to the ex wife, he let her go and now she has been tricked by her US lover into prostituting herself. jeez back to hitler ? i mean come on.
Member
Posts: 16,411
Joined: Apr 9 2007
Gold: 12,059.17
Apr 20 2025 04:12am
Would you say that Polish, UK and US propaganda never lied and never misled its population while Russian propaganda only lies?

Would you then argue that untold suffering caused upon tens of millions of people just in 21st century alone by Poland, UK and US was justified? Even Tigray war of 2022 pales in comparison what has been done by Poland in 21st century so far.

Would you say Poland would need to pay reparations and be ostracized by the civilized world for the actions of its government that misled its people?


Do you ask about Afghanistan invasion?
From the U.S. perspective in 2001:

The U.S. was attacked on 9/11 by al-Qaeda.

The Taliban regime in Afghanistan was giving safe haven to Osama bin Laden and al-Qaeda.

The U.S. demanded the Taliban hand over bin Laden — the Taliban refused.

So, under international law (specifically the right to self-defense under Article 51 of the UN Charter), the U.S. argued that invading Afghanistan was justified to eliminate the terrorist threat.

From a moral perspective:

Many people (even internationally) saw the initial invasion as more justified than, for example, the later invasion of Iraq.

The idea was: dismantle al-Qaeda, remove the Taliban, stop Afghanistan from being a terrorist hub.

That was the right thing to do. Didnt really work as intended, Talibans came back to power, but intentions were proper.

Are you aware that you live in some kind of Russia/China/whatever information bubble? They make you think bad about USA/west world.
Sure we all aint perfect, but we are much much better than Russia/China.
Member
Posts: 56,312
Joined: Jan 19 2007
Gold: 575,268.61
Apr 20 2025 04:17am
Do you ask about Afghanistan invasion?
From the U.S. perspective in 2001:

The U.S. was attacked on 9/11 by al-Qaeda.

The Taliban regime in Afghanistan was giving safe haven to Osama bin Laden and al-Qaeda.

The U.S. demanded the Taliban hand over bin Laden — the Taliban refused.

So, under international law (specifically the right to self-defense under Article 51 of the UN Charter), the U.S. argued that invading Afghanistan was justified to eliminate the terrorist threat.

From a moral perspective:

Many people (even internationally) saw the initial invasion as more justified than, for example, the later invasion of Iraq.

The idea was: dismantle al-Qaeda, remove the Taliban, stop Afghanistan from being a terrorist hub.

That was the right thing to do. Didnt really work as intended, Talibans came back to power, but intentions were proper.

Are you aware that you live in some kind of Russia/China/whatever information bubble? They make you think bad about USA/west world.
Sure we all aint perfect, but we are much much better than Russia/China.


you DO know that Osama bin Laden was killed in Pakistan right? You know, the failed state of Pakistan , the terrorist state, that the US keeps propped up? not Afghanistan.
And the US stayed in Afghanistan for 20 years, well after the death of Osama. because it was profitable to do so.

I dont see Russia or China traveling to the far side of the world to wage wars.
Member
Posts: 50,749
Joined: Jan 20 2010
Gold: 5,146.00
Apr 20 2025 04:23am
https://x.com/RepBrianFitz/status/1913299824494944423

When a sitting member of congress unilaterally travels to another country to commit an act of war without congressional approval or executive action, how does that shake out under the constitution
Representative Fitzpatrick is brushing up against it because he's trying to play around with the "I just signed a shell and someone else fired it" without explicitly saying whether he fired a weapon or not, while insisting he's traveled to the front lines (doubtful) which would make him a de facto combatant.
if tomorrow Ilhan Omar flew to Syria and signed an AK-47 for Al Qaeda's new government under Ahmed al-Sharaa, how would that work
Member
Posts: 16,411
Joined: Apr 9 2007
Gold: 12,059.17
Apr 20 2025 04:26am
But Ukraine put in its constitution a will NOT to be independent, to Join Nato. Its back to the ex wife, he let her go and now she has been tricked by her US lover into prostituting herself. jeez back to hitler ? i mean come on.


NATO is a voluntary alliance, a country can sign out anytime.
So technically by joining NATO you do not give away any part of your independence.
You Irish guys should try it, NATO is cool :)

We could make some kind of deal with Russia, such as half-membership, like to promise Russia that there will be no NATO exercises in Ukraine, that no NATO soldiers will ever come to Ukraine.
There are options on the table, but the Russia must want peace, and they dont seem interested.
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev1486548664867486848695001Next
Closed New Topic New Poll