That's my thought. If the jurors are doxxed, and they don't convict, their lives and their families are at risk. Likewise, being able to go home each day allows them to be inundated with wall to wall coverage from the MSM about how the racist white cop murdered the poor innocent black family man.

Depends on the state AFAIK

tl;dr past 2nd line
killers should be exectued yes. american society has death penatly which im okay with. we should get the guillotine back in here too.
on the other side we need population to be regulated, so yeah, keep going on americans. its fun to watch that circus. its just less fun when french police becomes as violent as your though.

This post was edited by Melatonina on Apr 2 2021 04:32am

Once again, what does this have to do with the Chauvin trial? The trial is occurring to determine guilt or innocence. This is literally the process working as it should. Likewise, "execution" is NOT legal "in the United States". It's legal in "some states" and as a federal sentence. Minnesota just so happens to NOT be one of the states where it is legal, and Chauvin is being tried by the State, NOT the Federal Government.

Why don't you go ahead and close out of this thread and not come back, since you don't seem to know ANYTHING about the trial, the law in the state where it's occurring, or anything else other than "cop bad, criminal good."

I'm from Minnesota and can confirm that we have no execution. There was a bit about shooting individuals over private property disputes. That likely would not justify a shooting here. We don't have stand your ground, except when there is no ground to give such as in your home.

This post was edited by RedFromWinter on Apr 2 2021 05:44am

because there is no need for trial just common sense. it was filmed.
bitch you would be less precautionous it that guy was someone of your family and probably try to avenge yourself before justice decide anything. little hypocrite

Aren't you tired of being wrong? You didn't know Minnesota outlawed the Death Penalty 110 years ago (1911), you don't understand how the court system works, you've made claims that it's legal to kill people over property violations which is factually incorrect in the majority of the nation, and now you're claiming that a trial is not needed at all because... Video?

How about this. We have a Constitution. That Constitution has these things called Amendments, that outline a Bill of Rights the people are guaranteed. The sixth such Amendment reads as follows:



I get that you're from a nation that decided to go Guillotine everyone they didn't like for any or no reason at all. Unlike France, however, the United States believes in Civil Rights.

Further, if one of my little brothers got caught using fake cash, resisted arrest, swallowed a bunch of methamphetamines and fentanyl, struggled against police, and ended up dying from a drug induced heart attack, I'd spit on his grave and disown him.

https://www.hennepin.us/-/media/hennepinus/residents/public-safety/documents/floyd-autopsy-6-3-20.pdf ←Read the autopsy report, genius. In the meantime, in your world of "people don't deserve due process" the civilized people of PaRD can view you as the animal you are.

i'm getting tired of people saying "There should be no trial". in my opinion we need to round up everyone who believes that and execute them without a trial

I'm assuming the irony is part of the joke.

Oh the irony