d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > Russia / Ukraine
Prev14624634644654664539Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 26,591
Joined: Aug 11 2013
Gold: 19,900.00
Apr 13 2022 08:37am
Quote (Black XistenZ @ Apr 13 2022 10:18am)
Fair argument, but I have to vehemently disagree. The West and Ukraine tried to appease Russia after 2014, they let Russia get away with the annexation of Crimea against international law, they were willing to accept Russian control over the separatist regions in Donbass. A NATO membership was not realistic, no matter how much the Ukrainian government might have ran their mouth about it.

In particular, it's asinine to assume that ceding Crimea, Donetsk and Luhansk to Russia would have resulted in peace and sovereignty for the rest of Ukraine. Putin doesn't recognize Ukraine's right to exist as a sovereign nation, he's overtly said so throughout the years on countless occasions. Imho, this war had to happen to settle the issue. Only after a scenario in which Russia tried and failed to subjugate Ukraine can the rest of Ukraine, however much of it is left after the war, become a free nation.




The way I see it, Putin threw down the gauntlet to the rest of the world and formulated what I would call the "Putin doctrine" about the "limited sovereignty of Russia's neighbors". The invasion of Ukraine has made it clear once and for all that he's willing to go to any lengths to enforce it. This current war is essentially a battle between the West and Russia to see if Putin actually has the ability to enforce this doctrine.


Not really, the Donbass includes cities like Mariupol and other cities in the region that in response to them trying to break away Ukraine sent tens of thousands of troops. They then started to de-russify those heavily Russian cities by sending Azov type militias to intimidate and shut down any separatist movements.

I mean i don't really disagree with your last point, it's certainly a war over influence, the west thought it was going to turn Russia's closest satellite state against them, miscalculating the response then Russia in turn miscalculating Ukrainian resistance.
Member
Posts: 16,971
Joined: Feb 24 2018
Gold: 7,648.00
Apr 13 2022 08:38am
So, Polish president, Duda, invited Steinmeier, German president, to come along with 3 other eastern Europeans and visit Kyiv. Zelensky's staff declared our president a person non grata over his political involvment in the past years. Then, they went on saying, they'd rather have Scholz visit. Well, Scholz was reigning alongside Merkel all those years, Steinmeier's role was rather insignificant. Our president is formerly our head of state. Refusing him would be like refusing the visit to the queen of England. Would Johnson go and visit the country afterwards? Scholz dimplomatically told Ukraine to go f*** themselves. Whether he'll visit or not is up to himself. The scandal is huge. Even though our president, the Ukrainian speaker and Polish president confirmed the incident, an Ukrainian speaker came out saying "Zelensky didn't refuse the visit" to save what can be saved. It just means he didn't send him home personally but through diplomatic channels. I don't give much f*** about diplomatic back and forths but people in Germany are really pissed off. The public opinion is changing against the Ukrainian government. Those idiots don't know that our government can't help Ukraine if the people in Germany don't want to. For politicians, it would be like shooting oneself into knee. So yeah, keep blaming Germany and Germany only, the second highest doner after the US to Ukraine until our people here have got enough.

This post was edited by babun1024 on Apr 13 2022 08:40am
Member
Posts: 3,771
Joined: Sep 29 2021
Gold: 14,158.00
Apr 13 2022 08:38am
Quote (thesnipa @ Apr 13 2022 08:36am)
I wont be, because unlike you ive said all along thats what the war was about. a land grab, not a righteous war against nazis. not to protect ethnic russians.

its to grab land and prove to countries on the NATO bubble that wanting to join NATO means they're a target before they can even join, and that the west wont move in to save them.


It's both, actually.

Ukraine will end up both demilitarized and denazified as stated in the original objectives.

The demilitarization aspect is already almost done, Ukraine has already lost 95% of their heavy war industry, and a huge chunk of their combined arms capabilities.
Member
Posts: 46,881
Joined: Jan 20 2010
Gold: 22,149.69
Apr 13 2022 08:39am
Quote (Black XistenZ @ Apr 13 2022 09:29am)
The Ukrainiain leaders and people were well aware of that when they chose to fight instead of surrender. From what I can tell, the vast majority of the ethnic Ukrainians are firmly behind Zelensky's course and willing to make a stand against Russian aggression right here, right now. Countless Ukrainians living in Western Europe moved to Ukraine to risk their lives so they can join this fight.

Who are we to tell them that rolling over and chosing an existence as an enslaved and subjugated vassal state of Russia, including thousands of executed civilians and hundreds of thousands of raped women and children would have been the better tradeoff for them?


Far more fled. We had the scenes of refugees being stopped at the border and the men forcibly conscripted. What's our basis for believing that the majority of ethnic Ukrainians are behind a bitter fight on behalf of the west? Their presence on social media? Their state run news outlets and our western journalists credulously repeating their propaganda? There's no doubt a large chunk of the western Ukrainian populist base who have embraced anti-Russian nationalism, else Euromaidan would never have succeeded. They may well be a majority. But once we start looking at the numbers willing to risk their lives, those numbers dwindle. When Ukraine is recruiting child soldiers and shanghaiing refugees and won't swear off its Nazi brigade, we have reason to doubt their army's numbers and morale.

Most Ukrainians lived with Russia's grip on their country most of their lives, and in the last countrywide elections to be held, the Russian-aligned candidate won most of the vote. Not just from his native Donetsk and other eastern oblasts, but also the south and Odessa. He still got ~20-40% of the vote in districts in central Ukraine around Kiev, only Lviv and its surroundings went 90%+ to the other side. What happened to all the people who voted for the candidate who got overthrown in a coup? A lot of them seceded, sure. Many still lived in the west and south. And when war came, they probably fled already
Member
Posts: 26,971
Joined: Dec 21 2007
Gold: 14,569.69
Apr 13 2022 08:39am
Quote (chopstickz777 @ Apr 13 2022 07:25am)
Yes and that might end up being exactly what happens.

Because at the end of the day if lives can be saved and objectives achieved at the same time, that is a win.

But don't be surprised when it ends up being the entire black sea coast Russia takes.


well then we really will be in WW3 because Romania/Bulgaria have been in NATO for over a decade
Member
Posts: 3,771
Joined: Sep 29 2021
Gold: 14,158.00
Apr 13 2022 08:40am
Quote (babun1024 @ Apr 13 2022 08:38am)
So, Polish president, Duda, invited Steinmeier, German president, to come along with 3 other eastern Europeans and visit Kyiv. Zelensky's staff declared our president a person non grata over his political involvment in the past years. Then, they went on saying, they'd rather have Scholz visit. Well, Scholz was reigning alongside Merkel all those years, Steinmeier's role was rather insignificant. Our president is formerly our head of state. Refusing him would be like refusing the visit to the queen of England. Would Johnson go and visit the country afterwards? Scholz dimplomatically told Ukraine to go f*** themselves. Whether he'll visit or not is up to himself. The scandal is huge. Even though our president, the Ukrainian speaker and Polish president confirmed the incident, an Ukrainian speaker came out saying "Zelensky didn't refuse the visit" to save what can be saved. It just means he didn't send him home personally but through diplomatic channels. I don't give much fact about diplomatic back and forths but people in Germany are really pissed off. The public opinion is changing against the Ukrainian government. THose idiots don't know that our government can't help Ukraine if the people in Germany don't want to. For politicians, it would be like shooting oneself into knee. So yeah, keep blaming Germany and Germany only, the second highest doner after the US to Ukraine until our people here have got enough.


Zelensky is a coke addict that threw the lives of his own people away so they could film a Tiktok of them throwing molotovs at fully armed Russian troops.

What did you expect from this fucking clown?
Member
Posts: 43,553
Joined: Aug 25 2008
Gold: 50,405.00
Apr 13 2022 08:43am
Quote (Black XistenZ @ 13 Apr 2022 22:29)
Radical islamists have been rapidly gaining ground in Indonesia for the past decade plus. If I was a Singaporean geostrategists advising the SG government, I wouldn't bet on them remaining a friendly and secular neighbor indefinitely.



we already have our F 15S
F 35S are coming in soon
And we have a US military base somewhere around Singapore. :lol:
Member
Posts: 51,773
Joined: Jan 19 2007
Gold: 15,520.00
Apr 13 2022 08:45am


I read that earlier, but its not a big deal in the grand scheme of things. its no different then some random american briefly renaming french fries to freedom fries. it will blow over.
Unless I am reading the situation wrong germany is and has been overly passive, a by product of their cultural withdrawal from conflict which has last for 1/2 a century, and that they are not the guiding hand in any of this, so well, their likes / dislikes and small complaints are irrelevant in the current narrative. Well, other then gas, anyway.

Quote (Black XistenZ @ Apr 13 2022 03:45pm)


yes ok, TY for those. not an area of the world i am familiar with. Religion is the mother of all wars as they say.

This post was edited by ferdia on Apr 13 2022 09:10am
Member
Posts: 3,771
Joined: Sep 29 2021
Gold: 14,158.00
Apr 13 2022 08:54am
Quote (Goomshill @ Apr 13 2022 08:39am)
Far more fled. We had the scenes of refugees being stopped at the border and the men forcibly conscripted. What's our basis for believing that the majority of ethnic Ukrainians are behind a bitter fight on behalf of the west? Their presence on social media? Their state run news outlets and our western journalists credulously repeating their propaganda? There's no doubt a large chunk of the western Ukrainian populist base who have embraced anti-Russian nationalism, else Euromaidan would never have succeeded. They may well be a majority. But once we start looking at the numbers willing to risk their lives, those numbers dwindle. When Ukraine is recruiting child soldiers and shanghaiing refugees and won't swear off its Nazi brigade, we have reason to doubt their army's numbers and morale.


Nah man Ukraine has to sacrifice the lives of all 40 million of their people to hurt Russia on the US' order. Black Xistenz said so, so it must be true.

This post was edited by chopstickz777 on Apr 13 2022 08:54am
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev14624634644654664539Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll