Quote (Black XistenZ @ Jul 30 2021 08:40pm)
Plenty of virologists and scientists from other fields have been, and still are, pushing for such a strategy. It took Johnson in the UK a lot of resolve to dismiss their outcry when he pushed for a full reopening in spite of growing cases. Here in Germany, Merkel has strong sympathies for the concept, she just couldn't find the support for it among the state and local leadership. Australia and New Zealand keep up their strategy of trying to keep cases (of community transmission) at zero. China still does it. Vietnam and Thailand for the longest time did it.
Like I said, this debate might sound esoteric to you Americans, but it's real in other places of the world. And for this debate about whether to pursue "flatten the curve" or low incidences, it is highly relevant if the risk of transmission by a fully vaccinated person is reduced by a factor of, say, 90% or just by, say, 30%. If the number is 90%, then a 70% vaccination rate essentially means that the reproduction number of the virus is reduced by 63% thanks to the vaccines. If you want to keep infections down, which implies keeping R(t) below 1, you absolutely need that for contagious variants like delta with its R(0) of 5 or higher.
By contrast, if the reduction in transmissibility was only 30%, then a 70% vaccination rate would reduce R(t) by just 21%, which makes it impossible to keep R(t) below 1 without ongoing, open-ended lockdowns. Therefore, if these reports about vaccinations doing very little to stymie transmission are true, that's effectively the end for any low incidence strategy.
I appreciate the response but it was all in regards to the point which I stand by is not realistic
Covid isn’t going anywhere. Ergo mitigations are important that would threaten hospitals or excess human life. Worst of it is over I am sure. The vaccines do actually work and similarly to the flu vaccination , drastically reduce severity of the disease.
95% of current covid hospitalizations are preventable. If you want to talk about loss of productivity , look no further than an unnecessary hospitalization with a 4-5 digit bill afterwards. If the vaccination works and reduces hospitalization rate - why lock down? This was the point of lock downs to begin with, avoid hospital saturation.
This post was edited by Bazi on Jul 30 2021 08:06pm