Quote (Cannabist @ Jul 15 2021 11:33am)
It's circular because you don't understand it. If I were anti-conversation I wouldn't have posted and engaged in conversation. I don't like the negativity that I regularly see being perpetuated and defended.
you're not anti conversational, as i thought i clearly laid out here:
Quote (thesnipa @ Jul 15 2021 10:34am)
Person A defending Person B on the grounds of attacks against Person B being anti conversational, when the attack itself is for Person B being anti conversational.
I think you use "that's not irony" as a default statement, because most people don't know what irony is. I do tho.
and also here:
Quote (thesnipa @ Jul 15 2021 10:38am)
replace "defending" with "pointing out blah blah blah" and it's still ironic. the ironic aspect is the duality of anti conversational, not your statement inherently.
for someone who claims i dont understand irony u seem not to.
again u dont seem to get what im saying at all, let alone if it's irony.
your misunderstanding of whom is truly anti conversational is ironic, not YOU being that whom, as you're not the whom.
This post was edited by thesnipa on Jul 15 2021 10:37am