Quote (balrog66 @ 27 Mar 2020 17:35)
https://www.ft.com/content/258308f6-6e94-11ea-89df-41bea055720bThis didn't get much attention in the Corona thread. Maybe we can get some discussion going here.
On one hand I do agree we need to support all EU nations. On the other I do have some gripes with giving a blank cheque to nations that haven't exactly been fiscally responsible in the past. Imagine giving Salvini the infinite money printer of the FED, but with Euro's.
Blocking eurobonds from happening will boost anti-EU sentiment in southern member states. Allowing eurobonds will boost it in northern member states.
What we need here is a old-fashioned compromise. Eurobonds with small stipulations or something.
yeah it's a tricky situation. on the one hand, a vote against issuing eurobonds is a signal that could easily be mistaken for a lack of solidarity, but doing it without a strictly determined framework could prove to be extremely detrimental and costly in the long run - and do even more damage than the expectation of a post corona economic collapse (which is a realistic scenario for italy, and also some other EU members) could.
in theory and ideologically i'm in favour, but i share your concerns about the responsibility and commitment of some of our fellow europeans. at this point, i would say, it is simply too early for that kind of last resort measure - we don't have the slightest clue yet how severe the damage will be once the dust settles, and if this approach even makes sense.
i also don't think that either option really minimises the massive boost this crisis will give to anti EU parties and sentiments (one of the main arguments in favour of the bonds), it will just shift its focus either north or south. safe to say this crisis certainly hit the eurozone at the worst possible time, politically...