d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > Russia / Ukraine
Prev1456845694570457145725001Next
Closed New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 16,411
Joined: Apr 9 2007
Gold: 12,059.17
Nov 19 2024 01:58am
Quote (Malopox @ 18 Nov 2024 22:25)
Your initial comparison is incorrect as I already pointed out in my other post (#45624) - Yanukovich was by no means a traitor. Corrupt? Maybe. But not a traitor. He toed a careful neutrality line playing both sides against each other to get the best deal out of EU and Russia. Russia offered a better deal with less covenants attached and Yanukovich - mandated by the democratic majority of the country to do such a deal - signed it. It’s how democracies work literally. There can be no discussion about it. It’s a fact. He had the legal right to do it and the popular support to do it.

What followed then was an illegal overthrow of a legitimate democracy. I’ve spoken to many people from Donbass, Crimea and Kiev over the past decade and protests against Yanukovich were not nationwide. Only in the west of Ukraine and Kiev (capital) with people being bussed from Lviv and so on. People that tried to reach Kiev from Crimea were attacked and their buses burnt.

As I said again. Poland Lithuanian Commonwealth fully occupied Moscow for few years between 1610 and 1612 and their cruelty was so bad Russians revolted, liberated all lands to the south including Kiev and managed to completely dismantle Polish Lithuanian Commonwealth a century later. Poland disappeared until the collapse of Austrian-Hungarian empire. Don’t wake the bear. FAFO.

The paragraph about imperialistic desire is nonsense. Where do you get this stuff? Neither Putin nor Russsians have any intentions to rebuild any empire and simply beg to be left alone to develop quietly for a couple of decades amassing badly needed capital through trade and cooperation. Russians acknowledge the collapse of USSR as a tragedy as so many people were personally affected, but do not seek to rebuild it.


Russians didnt want polish king in 1610-1612 not because he was cruel, but because he was catholic.
The idea at first was to make a polish prince to convert religion to russian, but he was too young for such a difficult task, so it didnt work out.
Also the Russians had a different view of their country, Poles where liberal with strong private property and personal freedom, while Russians were autocratic with no private property. The difference was too much to make a succesful union of both countries imo.

Anyway we, the people of west, do not need to worry about waking up Russian bear, as he is already awake and eating countries.
The question is where do we stop him, do we stop him in Ukraine by assisting our Ukrainian friends (EU candidates), or we want Putin to test NATO in a few years.

This is interesting read about Russia:
https://thecritic.co.uk/the-ongoing-reality-of-russian-imperialism/

This post was edited by Ironfister on Nov 19 2024 01:59am
Member
Posts: 9,693
Joined: Mar 2 2006
Gold: 1,590.00
Nov 19 2024 02:10am
Quote (Ashirgo @ 19 Nov 2024 08:37)
So to sum up, Yanukovych and Ukraine were under economic and potentially also military Russian threat at the point in time when he suddenly stopped the parliament-approved EU talks.

Ah these Russians, always fun to be around. You either take their deal, or you freeze in winter without natural gas, or better yet they send tanks.


EU Accession wasn't parliamentary approved in 2014. You are free to refer to Yanukovich’s press conference dated 28th March 2014 where he outlines why he took the decision to accept Russian deal. It’s quite transparent and makes sense from his point of view. IMF loans had many caveats (like removal of subsidies for energy consumers, lower govt spending - meaning lower pensions / state salaries, etc). Benefit of having free trade with EU would have been less than losing free trade with Russia in 2014.

Not sure what you refer to when you talk about natural gas. Russians have over decades delivered every cbm of contracted volumes to the dot. If countries wanted to negotiate commercial terms they always could - but that meant no supplies until terms are ironed out. It’s not news and that’s how everybody else works including Americans, Qatari and Norwegians.
Member
Posts: 15,929
Joined: Jun 27 2010
Gold: 102,354.50
Nov 19 2024 02:21am
Quote (Ashirgo @ Nov 19 2024 02:37pm)
So to sum up, Yanukovych and Ukraine were under economic and potentially also military Russian threat at the point in time when he suddenly stopped the parliament-approved EU talks.

Ah these Russians, always fun to be around. You either take their deal, or you freeze in winter without natural gas, or better yet they send tanks. I'm not so shocked that many Ukrainians were fed up with this nonsense. Remind me again when EU threatens Hungary with energy cuts or with tanks.



Ukraine stole / diverted Russian natural gas leading to what's known as the Russia - Ukraine gas disputes.

When Russia stopped the flow of natural gas to Ukraine the EU also suffered the consequences (much of the EU's gas was transported via pipelines that run through Ukraine).

Later, after the Maidan the situation only got worse (for obvious reasons).
Member
Posts: 14,140
Joined: Nov 1 2021
Gold: 125.00
Nov 19 2024 02:31am
Quote (Malopox @ Nov 19 2024 09:10am)
EU Accession wasn't parliamentary approved in 2014.


2014 is when you invaded Ukraine for the first time.

2013 is when a resolution was overwhelmingly approved by Verkhovna Rada to continue implementing EU integration requirements.

This post was edited by Ashirgo on Nov 19 2024 02:32am
Member
Posts: 9,693
Joined: Mar 2 2006
Gold: 1,590.00
Nov 19 2024 02:34am
Quote (Ironfister @ 19 Nov 2024 08:58)
Russians didnt want polish king in 1610-1612 not because he was cruel, but because he was catholic.
The idea at first was to make a polish prince to convert religion to russian, but he was too young for such a difficult task, so it didnt work out.
Also the Russians had a different view of their country, Poles where liberal with strong private property and personal freedom, while Russians were autocratic with no private property. The difference was too much to make a succesful union of both countries imo.

Anyway we, the people of west, do not need to worry about waking up Russian bear, as he is already awake and eating countries.
The question is where do we stop him, do we stop him in Ukraine by assisting our Ukrainian friends (EU candidates), or we want Putin to test NATO in a few years.

This is interesting read about Russia:
https://thecritic.co.uk/the-ongoing-reality-of-russian-imperialism/


I’m sorry but this is again, factually incorrect.

Yes, Polish were Catholics and that much is true. They occupied Russia during times of Troubles as Ryurik dynasty has ended and Romanovs were not elected yet. Russian nobles organized a revolt and fought back the Polish. There was no universal private property in Poland in 17th century, serfdom was common and was only abolished after the fall of Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth.

The differences you speak of did not stop Romanovs to become one of the biggest powers of Europe - successfully marrying Prussian, Dutch and other Catholics to expand alliances through intermarriage. Last Tzar Nikolai II was married to a German catholic Alyx.

Russians have no desire to attack NATO and as mentioned before by many posters here - Russians will get roflstomped if they do. Thats why they need to stop expansion before it’s too late as once a technology to prevent nuclear strikes will get invented (laser AA systems?) NATO will immediately invade.

From the same link you posted you are free to read the original and judge it on its merits; https://www.trouw.nl/opinie/oorlogskoorts-in-europa-we-laten-ons-opjagen-door-de-vs~bba8646c/
Member
Posts: 9,693
Joined: Mar 2 2006
Gold: 1,590.00
Nov 19 2024 02:44am
Quote (Ashirgo @ 19 Nov 2024 09:31)
2014 is when you invaded Ukraine for the first time.

2013 is when a resolution was overwhelmingly approved by Verkhovna Rada to continue implementing EU integration requirements.


Me? Invaded? What are you on about? I was literally living and working in Singapore in 2014. No need for personal attacks here.

It was impossible for Rada to approve something which was not finalized yet. They did vote on a draft of the agreement in 2013 subject to many covenants and provisions and EU was exerting as much pressure on Ukraine as Russia at that time. It’s unclear to me why Ukranian nationalists and western powers didn’t want to follow a democratic process and organized a violent revolt instead of allowing Ukraine to debate its way to EU.
Member
Posts: 14,140
Joined: Nov 1 2021
Gold: 125.00
Nov 19 2024 02:47am
Quote (Malopox @ Nov 19 2024 09:44am)
Me? Invaded? What are you on about? I was literally living and working in Singapore in 2014. No need for personal attacks here.

It was impossible for Rada to approve something which was not finalized yet. They did vote on a draft of the agreement in 2013 subject to many covenants and provisions and EU was exerting as much pressure on Ukraine as Russia at that time. It’s unclear to me why Ukranian nationalists and western powers didn’t want to follow a democratic process and organized a violent revolt instead of allowing Ukraine to debate its way to EU.


"However, on 22 February 2013, a resolution was approved by 315 of the 349 registered members of the Verkhovna Rada stating that "within its powers" the parliament would ensure that the 10 December 2012 EU Foreign Affairs Council "recommendations" are implemented.[47] "

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/European_Union%E2%80%93Ukraine_Association_Agreement
Member
Posts: 14,140
Joined: Nov 1 2021
Gold: 125.00
Nov 19 2024 02:49am
Quote (Malopox @ Nov 19 2024 09:44am)
Me? Invaded? What are you on about? I was literally living and working in Singapore in 2014. No need for personal attacks here.


You shouldn't take everything personally.

Member
Posts: 9,693
Joined: Mar 2 2006
Gold: 1,590.00
Nov 19 2024 02:54am
Quote (Ashirgo @ 19 Nov 2024 09:49)
You shouldn't take everything personally.


I’m sorry, English is not my native language. How else should I read this. Please help me translate.

Quote (Ashirgo @ 19 Nov 2024 09:31)
you invaded
Member
Posts: 50,713
Joined: Jan 20 2010
Gold: 4,861.00
Nov 19 2024 03:40am
Quote (Ashirgo @ Nov 19 2024 01:37am)
So to sum up, Yanukovych and Ukraine were under economic and potentially also military Russian threat at the point in time when he suddenly stopped the parliament-approved EU talks.

Ah these Russians, always fun to be around. You either take their deal, or you freeze in winter without natural gas, or better yet they send tanks. I'm not so shocked that many Ukrainians were fed up with this nonsense. Remind me again when EU threatens Hungary with energy cuts or with tanks.


Have Russian, Chinese or Western masters been more benevolent to their vassal states? Russia wields a gas pipeline and rolls in tanks. The west wields an IMF or has the CIA organize a color revolution and DoD send in the bombs. China wields its silk road initiative. Bloodless- yet. Lord only knows how the Uigher camp template will get applied to troublesome african client states

Its a simple fact that no true sovereignty can exist for lesser states in the shadow of world powers. Ukraine was firmly in Russia's sphere of influence, and they had the best they could hope for: Peace, stability and incremental improvement to quality of life. What did they wind up getting from America?
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev1456845694570457145725001Next
Closed New Topic New Poll