Quote (Thebarba @ Nov 14 2024 11:22am)
All this makes me pretty uneasy about the future. Rival world actors should be expected to see the US as a bipolar demon. When the Democrat Party (unless overhaul) is in charge, the world can expect the US to provoke and instigate conflict, and perpetuate it so long as it's profitable. When someone like Trump is in charge, world actors can start to trust that diplomacy actually exists in the US. But at this point, Putin can tell Trump - "I trust you. But you only have 4 years. Who takes over for you? Be it a Democrat, or one of your successors, how can the bipolar US demon be counted on enough that we can accept a peace deal enforced by the good word of the US-lead rules-based world order, when it has betrayed us explicitly?"
Take it 1 step at a time. the first step is can Trump sit in the oval office in January. The 2nd step being, in 2025, can Ukraine replace zelensky with someone that can agree to a negotiated peace / or can russia contain any escalation in ukraine.
everything else after that is irrelevant for now. your point re: what happens after trump - i agree with, can trump be a kingmaker for a change in policy, but as Hamster said, unfortunately, when it comes to the middle east, and china, all US politicians have the same view, ergo we are still on a runaway train to war.
This post was edited by ferdia on Nov 14 2024 07:07am