d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > Russia / Ukraine
Prev14530453145324533Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 51,738
Joined: Jan 19 2007
Gold: 15,520.00
Nov 4 2024 02:58am
Quote (Norlander @ Nov 4 2024 03:00am)
From the point of view of banal erudition, every individual whose cynicism of thoughts associates concepts of paradoxical illusions simply cannot ignore the criteria of utopian subjectivism.


Esteemed Sir, might you endeavor to articulate this in the English tongue, preferably utilizing lexemes of limited syllabic breadth—ideally constrained to an octet of letters or fewer—whilst retaining maximal lexical sophistication and conceptual profundity?

This post was edited by ferdia on Nov 4 2024 02:59am
Member
Posts: 43,466
Joined: Aug 25 2008
Gold: 50,405.00
Nov 4 2024 03:01am
Quote (Norlander @ 4 Nov 2024 11:00)
From the point of view of banal erudition, every individual whose cynicism of thoughts associates concepts of paradoxical illusions simply cannot ignore the criteria of utopian subjectivism.


diu.... use simple straightforward Engrish.
Member
Posts: 52,495
Joined: May 26 2005
Gold: 4,404.67
Nov 4 2024 07:18am
Quote (Thebarba @ 3 Nov 2024 22:01)
If this is all true, this should be seen as the Biden/Harris admin's greatest failure. The sacrifices made to try and prevent it were staggering. Most notably to me, the devaluing of the USD through over-weaponizing of the currency, and the loss of a major source of raw resources as a trading partner. And Russia, while losing shit loads of men and material, gained a generation's worth of battle experience, and the most valuable and productive territory in Ukraine, leaving the rest as a rump state that dare not join NATO. We just fed our enemy so much XP, and for nothing. Only because the Western media is so controlled this won't be talked about as Biden/Harris's grand failure 50 years from now.


I disagree on some of these points, but even if all of this were true, you're missing one crucial point: the emergence of drone warfare is a total game changer and invalidates a lot military technology (battletanks, conventional missile defense systems, helicopters, perhaps even fighter jets). Much of NATO's military supremacy is based on technology which gets countered, either outright or cost-benefit-wise, by drones. The "Moscow-Beijing-Teheran neo-Axis" realy caught the West with its pants down in this regard.

It is extremely valuabe from a Western point of view that the neo-Axis wasted this moment of surprise on a target which is ultimately dispensable. Now, we know what we're dealing with and have gained valuable time to prepare ourselves for the challenge cheap drones pose.



Just imagine for a second that there had been no war in Ukraine, then China one day launches the long-anticipated invasion of Taiwan, the US fleet approaches, and the Chinese all of a sudden start overwhelming their anti-air with swarms of cheap drones. Instead of Ukraine, we would have lost several multi-billion aircraft carriers plus access to the world's most advanced chip foundries. And after the US Navy lost multiple carriers and was pushed away, what would stop China from teaming up with North Korea to invade South Korea from land and sea at the same time? All of a sudden, China is ahead in the race for technological leadership and AI while the West is faced with a huge chip shortage.

The neo-Axis could have used the moment of surprise to gain a gigantic advantage on the economic and technological battlefield of the 21st century cold war. Instead, they wasted it to seize some outdated factories in the Donbass and a bit of coal and natural gas.

This post was edited by Black XistenZ on Nov 4 2024 07:18am
Member
Posts: 37,947
Joined: Nov 16 2005
Gold: 13.37
Nov 4 2024 08:40am
A perfect testing ground before Taiwan, right :) ?
Member
Posts: 52,495
Joined: May 26 2005
Gold: 4,404.67
Nov 4 2024 10:12am
Quote (Norlander @ 4 Nov 2024 15:40)
A perfect testing ground before Taiwan, right :) ?


Is some experience worth more than the element of surprise?
Member
Posts: 37,947
Joined: Nov 16 2005
Gold: 13.37
Nov 4 2024 11:00am
Quote (Black XistenZ @ 4 Nov 2024 19:12)
Is some experience worth more than the element of surprise?


Why are you so confident that only the West is gaining some experience? I bet China have learnt a trick or two and it's them to mass produce drones, not to mention batteries for them.
Member
Posts: 2,422
Joined: Oct 1 2021
Gold: 1,978.00
Nov 4 2024 11:50am
Quote (Black XistenZ @ Nov 4 2024 06:18am)
I disagree on some of these points, but even if all of this were true, you're missing one crucial point: the emergence of drone warfare is a total game changer and invalidates a lot military technology (battletanks, conventional missile defense systems, helicopters, perhaps even fighter jets). Much of NATO's military supremacy is based on technology which gets countered, either outright or cost-benefit-wise, by drones. The "Moscow-Beijing-Teheran neo-Axis" realy caught the West with its pants down in this regard.

It is extremely valuabe from a Western point of view that the neo-Axis wasted this moment of surprise on a target which is ultimately dispensable. Now, we know what we're dealing with and have gained valuable time to prepare ourselves for the challenge cheap drones pose.



Just imagine for a second that there had been no war in Ukraine, then China one day launches the long-anticipated invasion of Taiwan, the US fleet approaches, and the Chinese all of a sudden start overwhelming their anti-air with swarms of cheap drones. Instead of Ukraine, we would have lost several multi-billion aircraft carriers plus access to the world's most advanced chip foundries. And after the US Navy lost multiple carriers and was pushed away, what would stop China from teaming up with North Korea to invade South Korea from land and sea at the same time? All of a sudden, China is ahead in the race for technological leadership and AI while the West is faced with a huge chip shortage.

The neo-Axis could have used the moment of surprise to gain a gigantic advantage on the economic and technological battlefield of the 21st century cold war. Instead, they wasted it to seize some outdated factories in the Donbass and a bit of coal and natural gas.


That's the idea - Russia has first hand visceral experience with drone warfare rather than what, at best, the US has which is observational. But even then, the US is so corrupt, drowning in bureaucracy and broken that I don't believe we will be gaining much pedigree without being directly involved in a mass drone war.
Member
Posts: 8,585
Joined: Mar 2 2006
Gold: 3,356.00
Nov 4 2024 12:19pm
Can somebody please explain to my why are people so upset about North Koreans troops allegedly helping Russia repel an invasion by a bunch of Ukranians, american ex-marines and other "volunteers" in Kursk?
Member
Posts: 43,466
Joined: Aug 25 2008
Gold: 50,405.00
Nov 4 2024 12:28pm
Quote (Malopox @ 5 Nov 2024 02:19)
Can somebody please explain to my why are people so upset about North Koreans troops allegedly helping Russia repel an invasion by a bunch of Ukranians, american ex-marines and other "volunteers" in Kursk?


Because.....only I can fxxk around with you, you can't fxxk around with me. If you fxxk around with me it's aggression, if I fxxk around with you it is to liberate you with human rights and LGBTQ plus DEI Love
Member
Posts: 46,823
Joined: Jan 20 2010
Gold: 22,159.69
Nov 4 2024 12:53pm
Quote (Black XistenZ @ Nov 4 2024 07:18am)
I disagree on some of these points, but even if all of this were true, you're missing one crucial point: the emergence of drone warfare is a total game changer and invalidates a lot military technology (battletanks, conventional missile defense systems, helicopters, perhaps even fighter jets). Much of NATO's military supremacy is based on technology which gets countered, either outright or cost-benefit-wise, by drones. The "Moscow-Beijing-Teheran neo-Axis" realy caught the West with its pants down in this regard.

It is extremely valuabe from a Western point of view that the neo-Axis wasted this moment of surprise on a target which is ultimately dispensable. Now, we know what we're dealing with and have gained valuable time to prepare ourselves for the challenge cheap drones pose.



Just imagine for a second that there had been no war in Ukraine, then China one day launches the long-anticipated invasion of Taiwan, the US fleet approaches, and the Chinese all of a sudden start overwhelming their anti-air with swarms of cheap drones. Instead of Ukraine, we would have lost several multi-billion aircraft carriers plus access to the world's most advanced chip foundries. And after the US Navy lost multiple carriers and was pushed away, what would stop China from teaming up with North Korea to invade South Korea from land and sea at the same time? All of a sudden, China is ahead in the race for technological leadership and AI while the West is faced with a huge chip shortage.

The neo-Axis could have used the moment of surprise to gain a gigantic advantage on the economic and technological battlefield of the 21st century cold war. Instead, they wasted it to seize some outdated factories in the Donbass and a bit of coal and natural gas.


just want to chime in to say its a good perspective. There's no way western military gurus can disregard the sea change this war represents and get blindsided in the future
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev14530453145324533Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll