cavemen gonna caveman



i definitely think there are americans on the ground in ukraine, but i guarantee its NOT enlisted soldiers

you cant cover up losses there, when one of these guys gets killed or hurt you need an explanation, thats why private security contractors became the shit

the only forces you could use are special units like navy seals, but there is no way valuable special forces are running around there

Yup.

Its not theirs.
Zero evidence? Ya fam, i aint gona be able to link you a msm article saying that a bunch of Americans died operating weapons systems in ukraine against russia. But if you knew how these systems worked and the training involved..

Lol'd

Its called casualty laundering. Helicopter accidents are a regular occurrence stateside dontchya know

This post was edited by zorzin on Oct 10 2024 08:57pm

To be fair, Chechens and Dagestanis are particularly lowlife, even by the standards of Muslim troublemakers.

The leaked US documents listed ~100 active military in Ukraine secretly but that was earlier in the war before we started sending long range missiles
There are definitely special forces operating in Ukraine, but almost certainly behind the front lines. Some as actual instructors, but pretty surely operating some systems too. And Russia has been overtly targeting American forces in Ukraine. Did any 'NATO instructors' die in the Poltova bombing? Here's the better question- if they die, do you really think we'd find out, or would they just cover up losses?

These are the same guys who brought us the White Helmets in Syria. Its not hard for them to cover up a few willing soldiers dying. The easiest method of all is to just not let the media report on it. Maybe the families know, and you can bring it to a newsdesk like the NYT or WaPo and they'll put it in a drawer and wait until you leave the room and call their CIA contact and tell them about the security risk.

Russia has definitely captured multiple western irregulars already, but the absence of active military really points to them being restricted to behind the lines, but they've still got to have taken losses with all these long range bombardments hitting advanced weapons systems, training centers, command centers, etc. And we still don't even acknowledge that we have forces operating in the country even though that's common knowledge and leaked papers confirming it, so its not surprising we don't cop to the losses

Welcome to the Russian federation, soon to be Iraq post Saddam 2.0

I mean people say that Putin is this ruthless dictator who wants to Russify everything he can but he let's these Muslim savages have regional autonomy.. doesn't add up

You're making one idea the hostage of another. Putin is a proven dictator actively and openly Russifying independent countries surrounding Russia.

The Kremlin essentially pays off Kadyrovtp act as a strongman and keep Chechnya pacified.
The Chechens let Putin remain, not the other way around.

Woman arrested in Odessa few days ago for raising Russian flag over Catherine the Great statue allegedly died in jail. Heart attack.

Russia waged two major and costly wars against Chechnya, with the end result being that a brutal dictator (Kadyrow) came into power and keeps a lid on the powder keg, in return enjoys a high degree of regional autonomy. As long as Kadyrow can keep the region stable, the Kremlin looks the other way with regard to his human rights violations and the occasional moments when Kadyrow's power goes to his head. But make no mistake: as soon as Kadyrow becomes illoyal to Putin or fails to keep his end of the bargain, he will get "replaced".

The kremlin could withdraw the money from Kadyrov. I doubt any part of the Russian miltary minus the Kadyrovites could march into any part of the caucusus' and forcefully replace anyone.

They couldn't remove a comedian from Kiev a few hundred miles away from Moscow.

This post was edited by Prox1m1ty on Oct 11 2024 10:07am