Quote (Black XistenZ @ Aug 12 2024 08:57am)
Ukraine is the party which has BY FAR the most to lose from a nuclear disaster at Enerhodar, so this claim that they were relentlessly shelling that NPP seems highly suspect if you ask me.
Ah yes, as everyone knows, Ukrainian handling of NPPs guarantees their complete safety, a NPP would never blow up under Ukrainian control. :unsure: :lol:
Ukraine was shelling Saporodjia NPP nonstop during Russian occupation. Russia had even less reason to cause a catastrophe with their troops stationed inside and around the Saporodjia NPP. The reporting at that time was so funny, MSM was avoiding at all cost telling that Ukraine was the shelling party. Instead, someone was shelling and it was dangerous
Quote (Djunior @ Aug 12 2024 11:11am)
As far as I know they already shut down all reactors but the plant still needs cooling. Also the spent fuel rods still need cooling.
As the result of Ukrainian shelling.
Quote (Goomshill @ Aug 12 2024 11:17am)
It can simultaneously be true that neither side has a direct interest in a nuclear disaster either on their territory or next to it, and yet the pernicious element of brinksmanship could make either or both sides have an interest in going right up to the edge of nuclear disaster in an attempt to get the other side to withdraw to avert such a disaster.
Saporodjia NPP is the biggest one in Europe. There is no way some of that fallout wouldn't hit Russia. The wind blows from Ukraine to Russia in those planes.
This post was edited by babun1024 on Aug 12 2024 07:26am