Quote (bogie160 @ Jul 20 2024 03:47pm)
It's incredible to imagine that some of the NGO organizations covering the war take themselves seriously. The prerequisites for a "good faith" peace is, per ISW, unilateral Russian withdrawal from occupied Ukraine and Russian Crimea, after which Ukraine and Russia can engage in "good faith" dialogue on whether Putin will face the death penalty in the Hague or perhaps plead to mere life imprisonment.
Treaties reflect reality, and the reality is that Ukraine cannot regain its lost territory, and that Russia appears to be internally stable and in no danger of economic or social collapse. The conditions above are clearly unserious in context of the present reality. The question is whether the West and Ukraine can change the current reality given time, or whether the present situation is likely to get worse.
This is part of setting out their stall for an inevitable negotiation. Russia has and will do the exact same.
Russia's latest ultimatum was the disbandment of the entire Ukrainian military, ceding all oblasts claimed by Putin as part of the RF (none of which Russia can claim to fully control) and assurances that Ukraine will never join NATO.
The more each side has to "give" or relent in negotiation the better from their individual perspective. Ukraine might say well, we can give up our claim to the eastern oblasts in exchange for x; Putin might say well, he relents for Ukraine's military to disband(lol) in exchange for Ukraine accepting Russian control of the eastern oblasts.
It doesn't appear either side is ready or willing to negotiate. Ukraine is not going to retake the eastern parts of the country and Russian is clearly incapable of the massive breakthrough it would require to conquer any of the major cities.
Russia could potentially make Kharkiv unliveable and Ukraine could potentially do the same to Crimea.
Ukraine is heading toward partition. Either as East/West Germany 2.0 or like North Korea/South Korea.
This post was edited by Prox1m1ty on Jul 20 2024 09:35am