Quote (ofthevoid @ 14 Jun 2024 03:35)
There was no reason for the McCain to be giving speeches in Kiev about how it's good to throw out the Russians and instead be pushing for pro-EU politicians. There was no reason to announce NATO expansion plans for Ukraine as early as 2008. There was no reason for the CIA chief to be flying into Kiev soon after the Maidan coup. No reason right? You guys want to keep believing fables that all these are just random unrelated events and it's not as if they were a string of very clear and obvious signals that the US/NATO was trying to pull Ukraine from Russia's sphere.
After the maidan, Ukraine's future was up in the air. It's not really surprising that Western politicians and agencies tried to get the dominos to fall into their direction. And just for the record: the Russians were doing the exact same thing in the east of Ukraine.
Quote
Their industry level is irrelevant, just like it's irrelevant in about half a dozen other EU countries yet somehow it keeps up with the EU. Half of the EU south basically is economies that are hugely levered to tourism and don't really make shit, half of central and eastern Europe is dependent on German factories and Germans themselves coming in to set them up. Cheap commodities are the lifeline of competitive manufacturing, and that's something the EU has always lacked internally, so it was an obvious positive.
Northern Italy actually has a strong industry, particularly many flourishing small- and medium-sized businesses. France, due to its tax model and propensity for bureaucratic overregulation, has very few SMBs, but a large number of top-tier big corporations. For all their debts, structural deficits and economic malaise, Italy and France have both been net contributors to the EU budget in virtually every year.
Also note that my argument wasn't about the economic benefits of a Europe/Russia partnership, it was about Russia not remaining satisfied with the role of Europe's proverbial gas station in the long run.