Quote (thesnipa @ Jul 16 2020 02:04pm)
yes, i'd describe wikileaks relationship to the Kremlin as "works with" rather than "works for".
still, from an american perspective, if a US politician was caught working with wikileaks they'd be tarred and feathered. whereas in Russia it's the actual govt working with them.
so not exactly a russian front, but not nothing either.
i miss the days when wikileaks was just releasing evidence US soldiers were being naughty, simpler times.
honest question tho, if in 2016 wikileaks had some compromising info on Trump, do you think they'd release it along with the HRC info? and would that decision involve asking Russia?
Probably not. Wiki has it's own enemies, they are not objective actors. The CIA/NSA, etc agencies and politicians that further their bidding like Hillary did with Libya & other interventions are their targets, not the guy that was in business his whole life and said repeatedly he wants to bring the troops home.
People bringing up the point that Wiki not being objective in who they hack or target is kind of a shitty point that's been used to try to discredit their revelations.
Quote (Skinned @ Jul 16 2020 02:49pm)
They had me at Collateral Murder.
Yes it is disappointing they turn a blind eye to the Kremlin.
Everyone knows Russia is corrupt as fuck and their politicians are corrupt and bought and their military and intel agencies will go to various places and do what they see fit to further their national agenda.
Difference is America and western nations and politicians pretend to be better and do things for good or noble causes, so they target these hypocrites.