Quote (Djunior @ Apr 23 2024 04:27pm)

Your post in the topic I linked above is crystal clear, you expected Ukraine's NATO trained NATO equipped brigades to crush Russia's WW2 era tanks lol.


At the start of the conflict everyone expected Ukraine would collapse and only because of Western aid they're still hanging on. By a thread BTW

Everyone understands Ukraine is on life support if you don't understand that I can't help you




They already had those missiles. Crimea bridge no longer interesting because of the railway so now the Kursk bridge is the target that will make Russia give up or what's the idea here?

Three villages? Did Dennys Davidov tells you that?

Massive cope

Quote (Norlander @ Apr 23 2024 04:24pm)

Why Kursk?

Quote (Prox1m1ty @ Apr 23 2024 05:31pm)

Congratulations, you've proven your dishonesty for everyone.

And no, they have had limited range ATACMs. They have confirmed the ones they will receive this year have twice the range.

Why not?

Quote (Djunior @ Apr 23 2024 04:41pm)

Ukraine's counteroffensive was defeated. Crushed. Before even reaching Tokmak let alone Crimea. Can't handle that? Your problem not mine.

Good luck with your new game changer, I get that you don't want to talk about all the other game changers, challenger tanks, storm shadow and so on (paper tiger syndrome)

Quote (Norlander @ Apr 23 2024 04:44pm)

Not sure, may be because it's already broken :)

Quote (Prox1m1ty @ Apr 23 2024 05:43pm)

StrawmanJunior strikes again :thumbsup:

Thanks for the laugh bud.


https://i.imgur.com/IQspVK4.png

I didn't know they had WWE in Russia? Hell in a cell. Vlad vs Boris. Last one not to burn alive wins the title.
In all seriousness. How effective is this against a 20lb explosive? How are troops getting out of this quickly?

Quote (Djunior @ 23 Apr 2024 19:41)

It's to defeat FPV drones not 155 mm artillery shells it's obvious

It took me 1 second to see there's a large enough gap to allow troops to get out just drop to the ground and roll sideways.

What would you prefer get one shotted by FPV drone or have extra protection. Inb4 dodge

Quote (Djunior @ Apr 23 2024 05:41pm)

It's to defeat FPV drones not 155 mm artillery shells it's obvious

It took me 1 second to see there's a large enough gap to allow troops to get out just drop to the ground and roll sideways.

What would you prefer get one shotted by FPV drone or have extra protection. Inb4 dodge

Quote (Prox1m1ty @ Apr 23 2024 10:51pm)

An fpv drone can carry 20lbs of explosive... That was the point of my question.
I'd prefer not to be sitting ducks for FPV drones because an autocratic senile short guy sent me to die for literally nothing. In exchange for 30 thousand dollars a year, which is hilarious btw.

Idk what physics you learnt but a chain-link fence isn't protecting you from 20lbs of explosive and shrapnel. Just not.