d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > Impeachment Hearings
Prev14142434445199Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 105,152
Joined: Apr 25 2006
Gold: 10,475.00
Nov 15 2019 05:16pm
Quote (ZxFamily-GuyxZ @ Nov 15 2019 06:12pm)
Someone explain to a pleb like me, pls

Why did they keep asking her about her feelings and how this is affecting her personal life/family? I'm confused as to what this has to do with anything?




Smoke and mirrors.
Member
Posts: 105,152
Joined: Apr 25 2006
Gold: 10,475.00
Nov 15 2019 05:18pm
Quote (fender @ Nov 15 2019 05:58pm)
trumptard logic / 10

also funny how you ignore the rest of her entire testimony because you mistake the deflection attempts of that idiot for proof of innocence.

https://d1i4t8bqe7zgj6.cloudfront.net/05-17-2017/t_1495063974740_name_20170517_McCarthy.jpg



You mean like the part of her testimony when she gets asked if Joe Biden withheld $1 billion USD until Shokin was fired, and she says: "Yes"

You mean testimony like that?



/e Or did you mean all the rest of her testimony that was stalling and whining?

This post was edited by Ghot on Nov 15 2019 05:20pm
Member
Posts: 28,888
Joined: Aug 11 2013
Gold: 10,712.00
Nov 15 2019 05:18pm
Can someone try to give me a somewhat objective opinion of what evidence there is so far? All i'v seen is a few clips here that prove absolutely nothing yet most print media is acting like it's a clear cut 100% impeachment confirmed.

This post was edited by ofthevoid on Nov 15 2019 05:19pm
Member
Posts: 54,196
Joined: May 26 2005
Gold: 4,945.67
Nov 15 2019 05:18pm
Quote (ZxFamily-GuyxZ @ 16 Nov 2019 00:12)
Someone explain to a pleb like me, pls

Why did they keep asking her about her feelings and how this is affecting her personal life/family? I'm confused as to what this has to do with anything?


They wanted to get clips where an honest, competent woman is devastated while explaining how the evil, corrupt bully Trump destroyed the career she had been working for so hard.
The tactical goal of this is to influence suburban women - a demo which tends to dislike Trump and drift towards Democrats, and which tends to be receptive to emotional appeals.

This post was edited by Black XistenZ on Nov 15 2019 05:19pm
Member
Posts: 105,152
Joined: Apr 25 2006
Gold: 10,475.00
Nov 15 2019 05:22pm
Quote (ofthevoid @ Nov 15 2019 06:18pm)
Can someone try to give me a somewhat objective opinion of what evidence there is so far? All i'v seen is a few clips here that prove absolutely nothing yet most print media is acting like it's a clear cut 100% impeachment confirmed.




Post #416 and post # 422. That's it. Nunes even asked her... "then I wonder why you're even here today".
Member
Posts: 39,303
Joined: Mar 13 2006
Gold: 0.71
Nov 15 2019 05:27pm
Quote (Black XistenZ @ Nov 15 2019 06:18pm)
They wanted to get clips where an honest, competent woman is devastated while explaining how the evil, corrupt bully Trump destroyed the career she had been working for so hard.
The tactical goal of this is to influence suburban women - a demo which tends to dislike Trump and drift towards Democrats, and which tends to be receptive to emotional appeals.


"I don't dispute that the president has the right to withdraw an ambassador at any time for any reason, but I do wonder why it was necessary to smear my campaign"

I died when she said this :lol:

This isn't about you sweety
Member
Posts: 61,688
Joined: Mar 14 2006
Gold: 28.77
Nov 15 2019 05:39pm
Quote (Ghot @ Nov 15 2019 03:18pm)
You mean like the part of her testimony when she gets asked if Joe Biden withheld $1 billion USD until Shokin was fired, and she says: "Yes"

You mean testimony like that?



/e Or did you mean all the rest of her testimony that was stalling and whining?



Shokin.

It's as if you people have never heard of Euromaidan and the annexation of Crimea.

Shokin was removed as a condition of aid because Shokin was a Viktor Yanukovych supporter who endorsed attacks on pro-Ukrainian demonstrators.

This is a legitimate situation for withholding aid.

Withholding aid to bolster a political campaign at home and manufacture political dirt against a political rival is an illegitimate and illegal reason for withholding aid.
Member
Posts: 53,368
Joined: Sep 2 2004
Gold: 57.00
Nov 15 2019 05:46pm
Quote (inkanddagger @ 15 Nov 2019 18:39)
Shokin.

It's as if you people have never heard of Euromaidan and the annexation of Crimea.

Shokin was removed as a condition of aid because Shokin was a Viktor Yanukovych supporter who endorsed attacks on pro-Ukrainian demonstrators.

This is a legitimate situation for withholding aid.

Withholding aid to bolster a political campaign at home and manufacture political dirt against a political rival is an illegitimate and illegal reason for withholding aid.

no one needs to ‘manufacture dirt’ on Biden when he is still smelling young children in public for fun :wacko:

This post was edited by excellence on Nov 15 2019 05:46pm
Member
Posts: 28,888
Joined: Aug 11 2013
Gold: 10,712.00
Nov 15 2019 05:48pm
Quote (inkanddagger @ Nov 15 2019 06:39pm)
Shokin.

It's as if you people have never heard of Euromaidan and the annexation of Crimea.

Shokin was removed as a condition of aid because Shokin was a Viktor Yanukovych supporter who endorsed attacks on pro-Ukrainian demonstrators.

This is a legitimate situation for withholding aid.

Withholding aid to bolster a political campaign at home and manufacture political dirt against a political rival is an illegitimate and illegal reason for withholding aid.


Interested to hear your reasoning for why Burisma sent tens of millions of USD to an LLC owned by Hunter, Kerry, etc.
Member
Posts: 53,368
Joined: Sep 2 2004
Gold: 57.00
Nov 15 2019 05:51pm
Quote (Black XistenZ @ 15 Nov 2019 18:18)
They wanted to get clips where an honest, competent woman is devastated while explaining how the evil, corrupt bully Trump destroyed the career she had been working for so hard.
The tactical goal of this is to influence suburban women - a demo which tends to dislike Trump and drift towards Democrats, and which tends to be receptive to emotional appeals.


Quote (ZxFamily-GuyxZ @ 15 Nov 2019 18:27)
"I don't dispute that the president has the right to withdraw an ambassador at any time for any reason, but I do wonder why it was necessary to smear my campaign"

I died when she said this :lol:

This isn't about you sweety

yep
lack of appeal to logic or reason will lead to an attempt to appeal to emotions
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev14142434445199Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll