d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > Amy Coney Barrett Hearings
Prev1404142434446Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 54,184
Joined: May 26 2005
Gold: 4,945.67
Oct 29 2020 06:28am
Quote (Plaguefear @ 28 Oct 2020 11:46)
We use imperial for a few things still, fishing related math is mostly in lbs for example.
A 40 pounder sounds better than 20 kg.


But 20 cm sounds better than 8 inches. :unsure:
Member
Posts: 57,901
Joined: Dec 3 2008
Gold: 286.00
Oct 29 2020 06:33am
Quote (ofthevoid @ Oct 28 2020 07:39am)
Yeah that perspective doesn't make sense to me. A city that has a massive amount of lobbyists, lawyers, judges, consultants, advisors, appointed officials, nsa/cia/fill in theblank agents and so on is by no means disenfranchised.

This is the equivalent of asking why the kings court doesn't get additional power, like lol, because they already have so much of it in there.


You would have argued to stay in England apparently. You're like "taxation without representation is cool, any boots to lick, master?" lol.

Quote (ofthevoid @ Oct 29 2020 08:24am)
I still haven't seen a compelling reason why people in DC can't attach their votes to Maryland. Saying 'neither side wants it' is weak. Like why don't they want it? Who exactly is giving these 'reasons'. For all you know it's basically Democratic leadership that sees there's zero to gain from it so instead they're pushing for an option that has max benefit. Maryland is a perpetually blue state, so adding an additional 400-500k of more blue votes is meaningless, obviously blue run Maryland & DC are not going to want it.

Choosing the option that has most political impact and saying it's the only way is also just as political as republicans not wanting to confirm it as it's own entity.


"Neither side wanting it is weak" -- spoken like a true white man lol. "I don't care what people involved what, just what I want".

We had a revolution because we couldn't stand taxation without representation. A cure for this would be to eliminate the federal income tax for individuals living in DC and see what kinds of problems that causes, what bottomfeeders it causes to relocate their business office to DC lol.
Member
Posts: 28,884
Joined: Aug 11 2013
Gold: 10,712.00
Oct 29 2020 06:40am
Quote (Skinned @ Oct 29 2020 08:33am)
You would have argued to stay in England apparently. You're like "taxation without representation is cool, any boots to lick, master?" lol.



"Neither side wanting it is weak" -- spoken like a true white man lol. "I don't care what people involved what, just what I want".

We had a revolution because we couldn't stand taxation without representation. A cure for this would be to eliminate the federal income tax for individuals living in DC and see what kinds of problems that causes, what bottomfeeders it causes to relocate their business office to DC lol.


Democrat run state and city want the option that will benefit their party politics, that's just objective reality. That's not how democracy works. People who are life long bureaucrats are naturally going to prefer the party that always wants a bigger government.

Sorry, I just don't think it's best to create our own version of the house of lords with a medium sized city being so special to have 2 senators.
Member
Posts: 57,901
Joined: Dec 3 2008
Gold: 286.00
Oct 29 2020 06:41am
Quote (ofthevoid @ Oct 29 2020 08:40am)
Democrat run state and city want the option that will benefit their party politics, that's just objective reality. That's not how democracy works. People who are life long bureaucrats are naturally going to prefer the party that always wants a bigger government.

Sorry, I just don't think it's best to create our own version of the house of lords with a medium sized city being so special to have 2 senators.


Your problem is you're unable to be objective and you don't respect the Constitution.

Your comparison is stupid also. The house of lords comparison doesn't even make sense.

This post was edited by Skinned on Oct 29 2020 06:42am
Member
Posts: 37,613
Joined: May 3 2007
Gold: 119,903.34
Oct 29 2020 09:16am
I know someone personally more qualified than this chick. I mean I understand she was chosen because of appearances and her beliefs but you'd think at least you'd choose someone who has good amount of experience being within the judicial process/system before they become a judge that is the highest authority there is within that branch of government.
Member
Posts: 64,763
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Gold: 0.00
Oct 29 2020 09:48am
Quote (ofthevoid @ Oct 29 2020 07:40am)
Democrat run state and city want the option that will benefit their party politics, that's just objective reality. That's not how democracy works. People who are life long bureaucrats are naturally going to prefer the party that always wants a bigger government.

Sorry, I just don't think it's best to create our own version of the house of lords with a medium sized city being so special to have 2 senators.


What percent of the residents of DC are people with political influence?
Member
Posts: 34,649
Joined: Jul 2 2007
Gold: 273.37
Oct 29 2020 10:11am
Quote (sir_lance_bb @ Oct 29 2020 11:16am)
I know someone personally more qualified than this chick. I mean I understand she was chosen because of appearances and her beliefs but you'd think at least you'd choose someone who has good amount of experience being within the judicial process/system before they become a judge that is the highest authority there is within that branch of government.


The ABA disagrees with you and they're a liberal organization. Suffice to say that you don't know anyone more qualified.
Member
Posts: 28,884
Joined: Aug 11 2013
Gold: 10,712.00
Oct 29 2020 10:41am
Quote (Thor123422 @ Oct 29 2020 11:48am)
What percent of the residents of DC are people with political influence?


Give me a few minutes to consult my crystal ball on that one.

That's like asking how many good people live in my city.

This post was edited by ofthevoid on Oct 29 2020 10:42am
Member
Posts: 64,763
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Gold: 0.00
Oct 29 2020 10:44am
Quote (ofthevoid @ Oct 29 2020 11:41am)
Give me a few minutes to consult my crystal ball on that one.

That's like asking how many good people live in my city.


It's vitally important to your argument. If it's 1% then you're depriving roughly 693K people of representation for the sake of not giving representation to 7k, which is a non-starter.
Member
Posts: 28,884
Joined: Aug 11 2013
Gold: 10,712.00
Oct 29 2020 10:49am
Quote (Thor123422 @ Oct 29 2020 12:44pm)
It's vitally important to your argument. If it's 1% then you're depriving roughly 693K people of representation for the sake of not giving representation to 7k, which is a non-starter.


I don't need autism level analysis to come to the conclusion that DC, our capital which has the largest concentration of federal workers as well various auxiliary entities both from private business, foreign entities, etc. has comparable speaking an extreme concentration of power.

Like I said, no real excuse for many of these people to not* be under the Maryland umbrella when it comes to senators. Democratic leaders of both DC and Maryland deciding it's not advantageous politically for either side is not a good enough reason.

This post was edited by ofthevoid on Oct 29 2020 10:52am
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev1404142434446Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll