Quote (ownyaah @ Mar 13 2024 07:34pm)
The point i made was, even if (this is a mental exercise) maidan was legitimate, what followed was not.
Maidan happened on the premise of EU membership, and the istanbul deal satisfied this premise, yet there was no peace?
This leaves 2 possibilities:
Either it has to do with crimea (status russian)
Militarism and nato
I mean, any argument for legitimacy over the EU deal premise has to deal with the fact people could have simply voted for a pro-EU candidate in the next election. And if only half the country supported EU membership, what right do they have to impose their will on the other half? Not a democratic majority. So if they absolutely
had to have EU membership and it justified throwing out democracy, like the US south absolutely
needing their slaves, how can it give claim to the east? Separatist movements around the world justify breaking off because they are discriminated against, autonomous, or ya know, bombarded for 10 years by an anti-democratic government seeking to tyrannize them.