Quote (ofthevoid @ Mar 12 2024 02:23pm)
This isn't a recent trend but has increasingly been evident during the last few months. Every time Ukraine suffers some notable set back on the battlefield, few days, week or two later there's some loud headline. When Avdiivka fell western MSM in unison spammed headlines about dozens Su-34s being downed or Russian KIA in that city higher that Afghan war. When Bakhmut fell it was headlines of 300+k dead Russians and shovel wielding plebs zerg rushing Ukrainian positions. Now Ukraine continues to slowly lose towns and front ground and you have these types of 'look Russia has insurgencies' diversions pop up again. It's pretty cyclical in nature and does feel desperate.
and as usual NAFO twitter salivating at tall tales of insurgent 'Russians' taking territory in Belgorod
https://twitter.com/visegrad24/status/1767614087532351557Its weird how these 'Russians' are based in Ukraine, using Ukrainian weapons and armor, under Ukrainians command and crossing the border from the Ukrainian side with a coordinated Ukrainian drone assault
Whats clear from the footage is that Tetkino / Belgorod / etc did not get raided and Ukraine lost a
lot of armor in the assault, with all kinds of footage of it being abandoned and/or blown up.
On one hand, armor has become increasingly redundant on the battlefield, even abrams are just toasters now. But on the other hand, the retreat from avdeevka showed just how horrific a lack of armor can be when you need it.
If Ukrainians need to retreat under fire from another lost city and all their armor was wasted away on raids like this, they're going to be running across fields under artillery again