d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > Russia / Ukraine
Prev1403940404041404240434519Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 19,872
Joined: Apr 13 2016
Gold: 32,512.50
Warn: 10%
Mar 10 2024 02:10pm
Quote (ofthevoid @ Mar 10 2024 08:07pm)
Lmao.


>Cost of future conflicts if we do nothing.

As if this has any bearing on future conflicts. Tell me what impact spending 10 trillion on Iraq, Afghanistan and Syria had on future conflicts? Neocons are so funny in their framing. 1984-esque framing of war is peace nonsense. Always fear peddling.


Oh I thought you wanted to discuss something but you completely avoided my questions.

Well the exact counterbalance to your point is WW2. There hasn't been a global war for 80 years.
Coinciding with the increase in living standards of literally billions of people.
That is not insignificant.
Member
Posts: 26,542
Joined: Aug 11 2013
Gold: 20,065.00
Mar 10 2024 02:18pm
Quote (Prox1m1ty @ Mar 10 2024 04:10pm)
Oh I thought you wanted to discuss something but you completely avoided my questions.

Well the exact counterbalance to your point is WW2. There hasn't been a global war for 80 years.
Coinciding with the increase in living standards of literally billions of people.
That is not insignificant.


This isn't WW2 and Russia isn't looking to conquer the whole of Europe and start shoving Jews or any other ethnicity into ovens. It's a terrible comparison, which you keep falling back on because your argument is so weak that your only attempt at equalizing is to compare it to the worst possible historical examples?

It's a localized conflict between two neighboring states, a type of war that we've seen play out a dozen times since WW2. Sure NATO is feeding it with billions, which could push into a global war similar in scale to WW2 but we're no where even close to that.
Member
Posts: 19,872
Joined: Apr 13 2016
Gold: 32,512.50
Warn: 10%
Mar 10 2024 02:21pm
Quote (ofthevoid @ Mar 10 2024 08:18pm)
This isn't WW2 and Russia isn't looking to conquer the whole of Europe and start shoving Jews or any other ethnicity into ovens. It's a terrible comparison, which you keep falling back on because your argument is so weak that your only attempt at equalizing is to compare it to the worst possible historical examples?

It's a localized conflict between two neighboring states, a type of war that we've seen play out a dozen times since WW2. Sure NATO is feeding it with billions, which could push into a global war similar in scale to WW2 but we're no where even close to that.


Your point was that foreign military aid has no benefit to Americans.
That's false.
Your obviously intelligent enough to realise that so the dishonesty is not appreciated.

I will add that your comparison to warnin the middle east is a far worse comparison.
Again I would point you in the direction of the questions I posed.

How many Americans are directly or indirectly employed in the defence industry?

How much of that foreign aid is directly spent within the US?

You can not honestly answer these questions and maintain your original position, so I understand you will avoid answering.

This post was edited by Prox1m1ty on Mar 10 2024 02:24pm
Member
Posts: 46,752
Joined: Jan 20 2010
Gold: 22,164.69
Mar 10 2024 02:30pm
Quote (ofthevoid @ Mar 10 2024 01:57pm)
To counter the Fab-1500 glide bombs they need to be able to hit the planes further out ~60-70km behind enemy lines. Article talks about Patriot basically being one of the few systems able to do so at that range. The problem:

So very quickly you start to run into cost problems. Even if the launchers/radar battery and other support components aren't touched, each Patriot missile costs $4MM. But of course they will lose some of these launchers. Very expensive and for very little to no quantifiable benefit to the US, to basically throw billions at the wall hoping the Russians just kind of one day decide to go home.


Yes but the real issue here is the arms race. What are the FAB-1500 glide bombs targeting? Patriot batteries far behind the lines. And then it becomes a few thousand dollar glide missile retrofit like a souped up JDAM, taking out a billion dollar patriot.
And that's the footage we've seen confirmed already.

Russia adapted to the stalemate of their air power being unable to approach the front lines and Ukraine has put a bunch of AA systems close to the front where they are vulnerable in an attempt to hold back the current breakout- as well as committing the biggest armor pieces like a bunch of Abrams- and the result has been a bunch of destroyed Abrams and AA systems. They made all kinds of claims of downed SU-34s and there's some confirmed, but I think the confirmed Ukrainian major armor/AA losses outnumber them at this point
Member
Posts: 52,426
Joined: May 26 2005
Gold: 4,404.67
Mar 10 2024 02:57pm
What this goes to show is that Western military philosophy has fully bet on technological superiority during the decades of its post-Cold War hegemony. The weapons and systems developed in this mold are expensive and fancy, rather than cost-effective. Therefore, it's kinda trivial that Western arms are not suitable for winning a prolonged war of attrition. Ukraine simply cannot achieve superiority with the small quantities of modern Western equipment we're sending them.

This is valuable real-time info for NATO and friends since it exposes a potential strategic weakness of its arms strategy ahead of a potential war with China. Russia itself obviously can't really exploit this weakness beyond the confines of the Ukraine war. The combined air force of NATO would of course still be able to completely decimate all Russian forces and operations in Ukraine within a small handful of days really necessary, based on not just an overwhelming technological edge, but also an overwhelming numbers advantage. It's just that there is zero appetite among Western nations for taking any heightened risk of nuclear escalation, or for risking our expensive jets and AA systems.
Member
Posts: 33,693
Joined: Oct 9 2008
Gold: 2,525.52
Mar 10 2024 03:33pm
Quote (Prox1m1ty @ Mar 10 2024 01:39pm)
Isn't that socialism?


Instead we got socialism with EXPLOSIONS!
Member
Posts: 19,872
Joined: Apr 13 2016
Gold: 32,512.50
Warn: 10%
Mar 10 2024 03:53pm
Quote (EndlessSky @ Mar 10 2024 09:33pm)
Instead we got socialism with EXPLOSIONS!


Explosialism
Member
Posts: 19,872
Joined: Apr 13 2016
Gold: 32,512.50
Warn: 10%
Mar 10 2024 03:57pm
Quote (Black XistenZ @ Mar 10 2024 08:57pm)
What this goes to show is that Western military philosophy has fully bet on technological superiority during the decades of its post-Cold War hegemony. The weapons and systems developed in this mold are expensive and fancy, rather than cost-effective. Therefore, it's kinda trivial that Western arms are not suitable for winning a prolonged war of attrition. Ukraine simply cannot achieve superiority with the small quantities of modern Western equipment we're sending them.

This is valuable real-time info for NATO and friends since it exposes a potential strategic weakness of its arms strategy ahead of a potential war with China. Russia itself obviously can't really exploit this weakness beyond the confines of the Ukraine war. The combined air force of NATO would of course still be able to completely decimate all Russian forces and operations in Ukraine within a small handful of days really necessary, based on not just an overwhelming technological edge, but also an overwhelming numbers advantage. It's just that there is zero appetite among Western nations for taking any heightened risk of nuclear escalation, or for risking our expensive jets and AA systems.


Precisely or as some will frame it -
"NATO have sent all its weapons and they can't even make a single artillery shell, derp."



Member
Posts: 26,375
Joined: Apr 16 2007
Gold: 166,368.82
Mar 10 2024 04:52pm
Even if you don't like reading, there are some pictures to consume as well.
The British Army Review has published a special issue on the Ukrainian defence of the Irpin in the early weeks of the war.

issuu.com/chacr_camberley/docs/wip_-_bar_special?fr=xKAE9_zU1NQ

the first link doesn't seem to be imbedded so you can also use this one
https://issuu.com/chacr_camberley/docs/wip_-_bar_special


The Ukrainian government has responded angrily and vowed never to surrender after Pope Francis said the country should have “the courage to raise the white flag” and negotiate an end to the war with Russia.

“Our flag is a yellow and blue one. This is the flag by which we live, die, and prevail. We shall never raise any other flags,” Ukraine’s foreign minister, Dmytro Kuleba, said on social media on Sunday.

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2024/mar/10/pope-francis-criticised-for-saying-ukraine-should-raise-white-flag-and-end-war-with-russia

This post was edited by Gala on Mar 10 2024 04:56pm
Member
Posts: 4,145
Joined: Jun 30 2022
Gold: 4.91
Warn: 10%
Mar 10 2024 05:18pm
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev1403940404041404240434519Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll