d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate >
Poll > Jim Acosta:trump Was Out Playing Golf Today At His
Prev13456721Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
  Guests cannot view or vote in polls. Please register or login.
Member
Posts: 39,496
Joined: Sep 5 2016
Gold: 0.69
Warn: 10%
Feb 19 2021 01:55am
TDS TDS TDS TDS THEY CANT LIVE WITHOUT HIM
CONGRESS' NEW BILL PREVENTS TRUMP FROM BEING BURIED AT ARLINGTON !
https://www.bitchute.com/video/hnoUnf3lapqQ/

This post was edited by TiStuff on Feb 19 2021 01:56am
Member
Posts: 20,762
Joined: Jul 21 2005
Gold: 6,061.70
Feb 19 2021 02:06am
Quote (IceMage @ 18 Feb 2021 05:42)
You can't figure out what national security secret means? Really?

https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/trump-legal-authority-declassify-intelligence/story?id=47436559

The president can declassify whatever he wants, even if it tremendously harms our national security.

Have you followed the Trump presidency at all? DOJ maintains that the president cannot be indicted while in office... so impeachment and removal is the remedy for certain violations of criminal statutes, and other high crimes and misdemeanors that don't violate the law.


At what point did he declassify and reveal national security secrets?

And what do you deem to be a national security secrets? I mean, why are some of the documents surrounding JFK assassination still classified? What has Trump (or any other President) declassified in recent memory that would be harmful to the people of the United States?

The entire base issue behind what you're saying is, "Somebody does something that I don't like or want to claim I don't like because he's the opposition, accuse him of 'crimes' that aren't actually crimes."

Scroll back, refer to comments regarding banana republic and kangaroo courts. :)

This post was edited by InsaneBobb on Feb 19 2021 02:06am
Member
Posts: 48,904
Joined: Jun 18 2006
Gold: 5,011.77
Feb 19 2021 07:42am
Quote (InsaneBobb @ Feb 19 2021 03:06am)
At what point did he declassify and reveal national security secrets?

And what do you deem to be a national security secrets? I mean, why are some of the documents surrounding JFK assassination still classified? What has Trump (or any other President) declassified in recent memory that would be harmful to the people of the United States?

The entire base issue behind what you're saying is, "Somebody does something that I don't like or want to claim I don't like because he's the opposition, accuse him of 'crimes' that aren't actually crimes."

Scroll back, refer to comments regarding banana republic and kangaroo courts. :)


It was a hypothetical to show that the president can do things that don't violate criminal statutes but still deserve impeachment/removal.
Member
Posts: 20,762
Joined: Jul 21 2005
Gold: 6,061.70
Feb 19 2021 07:53am
Quote (IceMage @ 19 Feb 2021 05:42)
It was a hypothetical to show that the president can do things that don't violate criminal statutes but still deserve impeachment/removal.


Right, and I get the hypothetical, the question is, what exactly would he have to declassify and release to have it deemed as a "national security secret"? Like, if he'd declassified some UFO crash, but all the crash yielded was a mix of burnt metal and ceramic, would it be national security related? If so how and why? If there's no tech or anything, how would it harm the people of the United States for the information to go to the public? Wouldn't it resolve a question that might even provide a real reason for the world to get together and solve the space travel question?

Or how about the 9/11 report. Why was it classified in the first place? Wouldn't it have been in the interests of the American People and in the security of the American people to know that the government was forewarned of the attack, ill prepared to handle it, and it was funded by the Saudis?

Like, my question here is, given the Executive and Legislative are co-equal but often competing branches of government meant to check and balance each other, why should the legislature be permitted to go after the executive over frivolous nonsense and false charges, while committing perjury (that's what the edited video was, fyi) during the sham trial?

Given the Executive has the authority to direct the DoJ, if Senators and Representatives are going to try to target the Executive if they're from the opposing party, why shouldn't the Executive utilize the DoJ to constantly open investigations against Congresspeople? Or the IRS?

Oh... Wait... Obama did that. A lot. I withdraw the question. It seems painfully clear, these loopholes exist so that Democrats can attempt to bypass the election process and the balance of power strictly to target their Republican opponents. Did I read that right? :)
Member
Posts: 39,496
Joined: Sep 5 2016
Gold: 0.69
Warn: 10%
Feb 19 2021 08:05am
Quote (InsaneBobb @ Feb 19 2021 05:53am)
Right, and I get the hypothetical, the question is, what exactly would he have to declassify and release to have it deemed as a "national security secret"? Like, if he'd declassified some UFO crash, but all the crash yielded was a mix of burnt metal and ceramic, would it be national security related? If so how and why? If there's no tech or anything, how would it harm the people of the United States for the information to go to the public? Wouldn't it resolve a question that might even provide a real reason for the world to get together and solve the space travel question?

Or how about the 9/11 report. Why was it classified in the first place? Wouldn't it have been in the interests of the American People and in the security of the American people to know that the government was forewarned of the attack, ill prepared to handle it, and it was funded by the Saudis?

Like, my question here is, given the Executive and Legislative are co-equal but often competing branches of government meant to check and balance each other, why should the legislature be permitted to go after the executive over frivolous nonsense and false charges, while committing perjury (that's what the edited video was, fyi) during the sham trial?

Given the Executive has the authority to direct the DoJ, if Senators and Representatives are going to try to target the Executive if they're from the opposing party, why shouldn't the Executive utilize the DoJ to constantly open investigations against Congresspeople? Or the IRS?

Oh... Wait... Obama did that. A lot. I withdraw the question. It seems painfully clear, these loopholes exist so that Democrats can attempt to bypass the election process and the balance of power strictly to target their Republican opponents. Did I read that right? :)


this person did a interesting thing on the twin towers
Dr. Judy Wood - Where Did the Towers Go? - YouTube
www.youtube.com › watch
Video for dr judy woods where did the towers go youtube
1:16:00
Where Did The Towers Go is Dr. Judy Wood's book which is a summary of the physical evidence submitted ...
Sep 10, 2011 · Uploaded by bblcsedona
Member
Posts: 48,904
Joined: Jun 18 2006
Gold: 5,011.77
Feb 19 2021 08:16am
Quote (InsaneBobb @ Feb 19 2021 08:53am)
Right, and I get the hypothetical, the question is, what exactly would he have to declassify and release to have it deemed as a "national security secret"? Like, if he'd declassified some UFO crash, but all the crash yielded was a mix of burnt metal and ceramic, would it be national security related? If so how and why? If there's no tech or anything, how would it harm the people of the United States for the information to go to the public? Wouldn't it resolve a question that might even provide a real reason for the world to get together and solve the space travel question?

Or how about the 9/11 report. Why was it classified in the first place? Wouldn't it have been in the interests of the American People and in the security of the American people to know that the government was forewarned of the attack, ill prepared to handle it, and it was funded by the Saudis?

Like, my question here is, given the Executive and Legislative are co-equal but often competing branches of government meant to check and balance each other, why should the legislature be permitted to go after the executive over frivolous nonsense and false charges, while committing perjury (that's what the edited video was, fyi) during the sham trial?

Given the Executive has the authority to direct the DoJ, if Senators and Representatives are going to try to target the Executive if they're from the opposing party, why shouldn't the Executive utilize the DoJ to constantly open investigations against Congresspeople? Or the IRS?

Oh... Wait... Obama did that. A lot. I withdraw the question. It seems painfully clear, these loopholes exist so that Democrats can attempt to bypass the election process and the balance of power strictly to target their Republican opponents. Did I read that right? :)


Member
Posts: 20,762
Joined: Jul 21 2005
Gold: 6,061.70
Feb 19 2021 08:28am
Quote (IceMage @ 19 Feb 2021 06:16)


It's all spelled out very clearly. Obama's President? He utilized the IRS to target Republican Senators and Representatives, sicced the DoJ on Sheriffs and other lower elected officials, and in general, put the Republican Legislature on notice that dissent would be punched down.

When Trump took office, Democratic Congresspeople refused to confirm his appointees, filibustering for over a year for his basic cabinet, threw a fit when he tried to fire swamp demons who were actively impeding his administration and tried to impeach him for "obstruction of justice" for appointing the staff that it was his right to appoint, NOT theirs, and in general, did everything they could to prevent the Executive branch from functioning.

Now with Biden, he didn't bother waiting for appointment confirmations, he just installed his cabinet and called them "acting", pretty much anyone who hadn't already resigned from the Trump Administration he fired immediately, and he got onto the business of ruling by the pen.

See the pattern? Dems want all the power all the time, and when they don't have it, they obstruct the operation of the branch they don't have to the fullest extent they're able. And when they do have it, they don't follow the Constitution at all. It's great, isn't it?

But go on back to watching Maddow now. Just stop pretending to call yourself "moderate" regarding anything. Be honest. :)
Member
Posts: 39,496
Joined: Sep 5 2016
Gold: 0.69
Warn: 10%
Feb 19 2021 09:05am
lefties be trippin

Dems Work on Bill to Prevent Trump Being Buried in Arlington Cemetery
https://www.bitchute.com/video/HRnK6u6paT1K/
Member
Posts: 39,496
Joined: Sep 5 2016
Gold: 0.69
Warn: 10%
Feb 19 2021 06:31pm
she still makin em earn their gimp masks

Kayleigh McEnany Mocks Biden "Loving" Kids & Jake Tapper Has Melt Down
https://www.bitchute.com/video/O70R79oYjnho/
Member
Posts: 39,496
Joined: Sep 5 2016
Gold: 0.69
Warn: 10%
Feb 20 2021 11:13am
they cant go a day with out him

Biden's Team Leaks Trump's WuFlu Medical Condition & it Backfires!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rdTb5muwGu0
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev13456721Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll