I haven't identified as a Republican in years.

It's not even a Washington Post employee... George could've sent it anywhere.

Never go full retard.

Also, can you point out where he went wrong?

This post was edited by IceMage on Feb 18 2020 11:21am

which neatly coincides with the timeframe in which the Republican party became somewhat relevant again.

Fixed

We have a two party system in America... the Republican party is always relevant.

Trump's corruption with Ukraine and pandemic mishandling has distracted the cult from Russiagate matters, but fear not, Bill Barr is here with an update:





So before the investigation is over, before any evidence comes out, Barr pontificates on the evidence found, claiming it wasn't just mistakes or sloppiness, but something more sinister.

Why the fuck is he talking about these matters? This isn't even a report... this is Barr supposedly sharing investigative matters on Fox News for the whole world to see, before Durham has indicted a single person.

He goes on to say the Russia investigation into Trump associates had no basis... which is completely absurd.

Honestly I'm kind of shocked by this. Barr has removed his mask completely for those who were on the fence... he's a nutty Trump cultist who buys into every Hannity talking point. I'm not shocked Trump appointed a complete hack... I'm shocked someone with a serious reputation turned into this.

The prosecutorial norm is "indict or shut up".

Comey got in trouble because he discussed investigative facts after deciding not to indict.

Barr is discussing these facts(supposedly, we can't trust a thing he says) before the investigation has even indicted a single person.


Will a single cultist express disagreement with this clear example of misconduct?

lol, that would require something that remotely resembles objective standards. we both know the answer to that. best you can hope for is a goon-shill essay trying to argue how this is completely different, and how barr is the embodiment of integrity and independence...

first, we've had more than enough reports out that back up the claims made by Barr.
he goes on to say, that if there was any "criminal" conduct by anyone, that they will be prosecuted.

Comey got in trouble for leaking classified information to be distributed to the press. (not the worst thing he did, but it's pretty open/shut that "he" did it)

here is 2 questions if you actually want to discuss this:
1. who did Barr single out for criminal acts?
2. what evidence substantiated appointing a special prosecutor to start the investigation "Crossfire-Hurricane"? (knowing now that the FBI team had to actually "alter" and "exclude" facts that would have closed the prior investigations)

This post was edited by tagged4nothing on Apr 12 2020 09:56am

The irony of Icemage being triggered by unsubstantiated facts on Russiagate when for years that's exactly what he lived and died by.