I heard Tucker Carlson is now also a state actor. And Douglas McGregor, Larry Johnson and everyone with a youtube channel that's not spamming pro-Ukraine propaganda --> state actors

Even users that post here pointing out the West's insane foreign policy / NATO expansion --> state actors

It's wilder than wild

If only the so-called "State Actors" got paid. Wouldn't that be fantastic?

Larry King was a State Actor for Russia as well, apparently.

As has already stated, nobody is saying Scott Ritter is a U.S state actor, the fact however is that he was.

That is not framing lol. Framing is how aspects of reality are communicated and nuanced. I asked a pretty straight forward question that did not include the current day. My question was: "Do you agree that Scott Ritter, the same person you claim is not a shill, was in fact quite literally employed by the US government?". I asked this question because YOU brought up that Scott Ritter is not a U.S shill, when he in fact has worked for the U.S government. It's a little ironic isn't it? The one person you don't consider a shill has taken money from the U.S government for services.

I mean I've asked this before but nobody can respond to it: Do you think it's important context that Scott Ritter stopped working for the U.S government and the UN not for ideological reasons but because he admitted and was convicted of sex offenses against children, and only then, when he got blackballed from establishment positions in the U.S, decided to become a Russian state actor?
It's called grifting, and again is not particularly unique.

Why are you rambling about Tucker Carlson and random youtubers you fawn over?
Scott Ritter isn't just a youtuber, he is PAID BY THE KREML TO HOLD SPEECHES. You literally call people you disagree with "shills" but you don't think that Scott Ritter, a man paid by a state to hold propaganda speeches, is a shill? I mean the jokes writes themselves.

What can I say, the americans offered to pay me to shill with services from american hookers and the russians did the same with russian hookers, it wasn't much of a competition

Tucker Carlson interviewed Putin and Western media are losing their minds over it, it's completely clear why I mention him because he faces the same kind of backlash Scott Ritter does. Everything I posted is on topic deal with it.

BTW the actual state actors I already mentioned (trash neocons) are not only being paid by the white house but they gave over 100B (that's a B) to Ukraine which made no difference at all (only made things worse) and that's the people YOU shill for, lol

Jokes on you bud

Are the people losing their minds over Tucker Carlson in the room with us right now? I don't know who you think you're talking to but its just a figment of your imagination, you're arguing against a strawman.

"that's the people YOU shill for" - I'm not american or a conservative. I quite literally don't have an interest in this what so ever. I also didn't realize that this thread is all of the sudden about me and people you consider neocons, I thought we were talking about Ukraine and Scott Ritter, state propagandist for Russia and former U.S government employee.

Incredible you picked this hill to die on instead of admitting Ritter is not an impartial source. Please do not relent and double down on this because its brilliant material.

https://www.rt.com/op-ed/authors/scott-ritter/

Looks like much hyped Azov Nazis couldn’t turn the tide.

I'm gonna type "Tucker Carlson" into google news and see what pops u-