Quote (BaHgerAUT @ 12 Feb 2024 07:33)
An isolated USA would have no power at all. As we are in a gaming forum more or less, i will give you this analogy: To win any multiplayer RTS game it's crucial to have mapcontrol. Without it you're lost. You won't win by controling the area within your walls only. The enemy that has access to the whole map will outpace you. Currently the USA has this access, and it would be wise trying to keep it, it pays off.
Quote (zorzin @ 12 Feb 2024 08:15)
I'm gona have to disagree with that one. The states has the only blue water navy with power projection and this is more than enough to control and subjugate anyone. There's a reason why the US is starting to pull out of syria/iraq; it's cost prohibitive and too easy of a target for cheap drone strikes. An isolationist America would still dominate the world, it's simply retarded foreign policy that has led to this debacle
Appreciate both your responses I brought up what I did as hypotheticals obviously but as you both know no military is going to be forthcoming about strategy and the MSM has only been an effective propaganda tool for international bodies not giving any average citizen like ourselves a very good reason to trust what they discuss in "public".
Problem-Reaction-Solution seems to be the only method the UN/WEF/NATO/Bilderberg/Davos crowd can deploy effectively because it allows them to obfuscate blame while calming the public with a solution they cooked up decades ago.
My whole issue currently with the Biden Administration and the Democratic party is that they've openly said "Russia is the boogeyman" and as Hilary Clinton said in 2016, "When the call gets made we have 5 minutes before all of our major us cities are turned to ash and that she'd "drop the bomb" / "make that call". Nothing I've seen points to if Biden is reelected that we wouldn't devolve into WW3 or a much worse situation in Europe/ME. I don't like Trump personally because he's a condescending divisive figure in American politics but at least he understands that our country is suffering "inside it's boarders" because for decades we've involved ourselves in conflicts abroad. It just costs too much as
stated but I do admit
that for the longest time we have controlled the world map and it is dangerous to just become a "hermit country" at this point but for Americans it seems like our only option.
I've always been of the opinion that no country is going to call us on our 35 trillion in debt because we'll turn their country to glass or start a massive war to prevent the debasing of the petro dollar which has been on the decline for decades and led to the formation of a coalition like BRICS.
Another thing. If the US military hypothetically came home and we stopped sending 100's of billions a year abroad we may have been able to handle the influx of migrants(not as an American "culture" but as a "safe haven". FEMA camps could be utilized and our military instead of toppling countries and projecting power abroad would be going and snagging DANGEROUS illegals(not starving families from South America but the military aged men from China/ME trying to destroy our country from within. Kick out Saudi Arabian/Chinese owned farms in the US. Attack the fentanyl crisis. Fix roads. Rebuild "American independence" which is why MAGA is a good concept with the wrong leader. Every American would rather see things within our own boarders resolved.
This is why I believe the "NWO" as so many call it cannot let someone like RFK/Trump into the White House because it would set them back even further from their agendas goals.
More so or less the cooperation and communication between China/Russia/US is good for all 3 but any non cooperation is perilous and dangerous.
No one on Earth wants WW3 or a large scale conflict but "behind the scenes" it seems like they are doing anything and everything to create conditions where a massive cyber attack/disease "x"/EMP/kinetic energy weapon/nuclear weapon gets deployed. Why? Because in their own words there are too many people on a planet with finite resources sustaining a society that will inevitably collapse and they want to be there to offer the "solution". Smart cities/no meat/less air/domestic travel/one world currency/social credit score/UBI/etc.
&&& I don't think Putin/Xi Xin Ping/Trump or Biden even have a say in the matter or they'd be dead and all 4 have families and aren't on a suicide mission so to speak.
This post was edited by SwamiVivekananda on Feb 12 2024 10:10am