That's a blanket ignorant comment if I have heard one.

https://www.rand.org/pubs/perspectives/PE198.html
"The Russian "Firehose of Falsehood" Propaganda Model"

https://www.express.co.uk/news/world/1865247/Vladimir-Putin-Tucker-Carlson-interview-russia#conversation-wrapper



This post was edited by babun1024 on Feb 10 2024 07:40pm

Completely unhinged. The UK mainstream ‘news’ is what happens when yellow journalism becomes the status quo.

t4t, following this



The usual fearmongering / propaganda to rally people.

This here is from Daily Mail, Jan 26th 2024

the state of current media.

This post was edited by ferdia on Feb 11 2024 03:44am

The daily mail and daily express, pillars of quality reporting since never

They usually read (mainly headlines) toilet paper and afterwards rant about the low quality of all media

This post was edited by BaHgerAUT on Feb 11 2024 03:46am

I do read the articles I post and did read the article I posted fully. It cites an expert (Neil Gardner) from Heritage Foundation a known US funded think tank. The expert provides no arguments, but makes statements like:



This sounds like propaganda as Neil is unable to address the content of the interview in any way and commits a logical fallacy by going ad hominem instead of trying to break the narrative.

This post was edited by Malopox on Feb 11 2024 08:26am

Those are trash tabloid papers. You and are using those as examples to create a generalised narrative of the entire British media, which is false. I assume you just don't understand how these papers are viewed in Britain. I would have thought Ferdia does understand and so he is intentionally creating a dishonest narrative.
Most brits wouldn't wipe their arse with the Daily express, The Sun or the Daily Mail.

People buy those because they put a topless woman on the third page, they don't buy them for accurate and intellectual commentaries on geopolitics.

This post was edited by Prox1m1ty on Feb 11 2024 09:56am