d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > Amy Coney Barrett Hearings
Prev1383940414246Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 64,763
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Gold: 0.00
Oct 27 2020 09:01pm
Quote (ofthevoid @ Oct 27 2020 09:59pm)
Because unlike Wyoming the aggregation in DC has magnitudes more power and political pull over the entire nation. So to give these people even more government control seems counter democratic to me.


Using that logic businesses have more political pull over the nation, so they shouldn't be allowed to vote.

I can justify any number of weird positions using that logic, because it's just a really bad argument.
Member
Posts: 49,896
Joined: Jun 19 2006
Gold: 3.88
Oct 27 2020 09:02pm
Quote (Cannabist @ Oct 28 2020 01:59pm)
Not like you hope it is.


When that avenue closed after the outbreak of American Revolutionary War in 1776, prisons started to overcrowd. Since immediate stopgap measures proved themselves ineffective, in 1785 Britain decided to use parts of what is now known as Australia as penal settlements.

Australia was literally founded because america became unusable as a dumping ground, nice try.

This post was edited by Plaguefear on Oct 27 2020 09:03pm
Member
Posts: 28,884
Joined: Aug 11 2013
Gold: 10,712.00
Oct 27 2020 09:05pm
Quote (Thor123422 @ Oct 27 2020 11:01pm)
Using that logic businesses have more political pull over the nation, so they shouldn't be allowed to vote.

I can justify any number of weird positions using that logic, because it's just a really bad argument.


You're using the word logic wrong. There's nothing logical about what you just said.
Member
Posts: 64,763
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Gold: 0.00
Oct 27 2020 09:10pm
Quote (ofthevoid @ Oct 27 2020 10:05pm)
You're using the word logic wrong. There's nothing logical about what you just said.


Whatevs. You made a shitty argument, so I guess trying to play word games instead of defending a bad argument for hours on end is an upgrade for you.
Member
Posts: 34,649
Joined: Jul 2 2007
Gold: 273.37
Oct 27 2020 09:49pm
Quote (thundercock @ Oct 27 2020 09:32pm)
If we carve out a couple city blocks in DC, the population would still exceed 700k. It'd be a small state, but larger than Vermont and Wyoming. DC already has the same representation in the electoral college so is there any reason why these folks shouldn't have their own state besides partisan reasons related to the Senate?


We already have to deal with Vermont and Wyoming. No reason to add DC to the mess, especially since partisan affiliation may change in ~20 years or so and we'll all likely be kicking ourselves when this is said and done.

We have enough small states, and probably should have been more discriminate in admitting them. If DC were millions of people, this would be an actual issue.
Member
Posts: 54,184
Joined: May 26 2005
Gold: 4,945.67
Oct 28 2020 03:00am
https://news.gallup.com/poll/260129/americans-reject-statehood.aspx

In a 2019 poll, 29% of respondents favored DC statehood, 64% opposed it, 8% had no opinion.
If support for it is suddenly much higher now, in 2020, this is almost definitely due to Democrats realizing the partisan power grab involved in granting DC statehood.

https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/why-dont-americans-want-d-c-to-be-a-state/
Quote
But perhaps there’s something else going on here, as Americans haven’t always been opposed to adding new states. For instance, before Alaska became a state in 1959, 71 percent of Americans were in favor of adding it to the Union, according to a Gallup poll from 1957.2 And support for Puerto Rico’s statehood remains higher than support for the District’s. In Gallup’s most recent poll, they found that two-thirds of Americans favor statehood for Puerto Rico.

So it could be that Americans just don’t think of the nation’s capital as a state. In an interview with Politico, Gallup senior editor Jeff Jones said that Americans’ (largely negative) views on the federal government might be influencing the way they think about the District. A Gallup poll from January found that a majority of Americans, 63 percent, said they have “not very much” or no trust in the federal government’s ability to handle domestic problems, and, Jones said, it’s possible that this attitude “rains down on D.C.’s population and local government.”


This post was edited by Black XistenZ on Oct 28 2020 03:00am
Member
Posts: 35,291
Joined: Aug 17 2004
Gold: 12,730.67
Oct 28 2020 03:07am
Quote (Black XistenZ @ Oct 28 2020 02:00am)
https://news.gallup.com/poll/260129/americans-reject-statehood.aspx

In a 2019 poll, 29% of respondents favored DC statehood, 64% opposed it, 8% had no opinion.
If support for it is suddenly much higher now, in 2020, this is almost definitely due to Democrats realizing the partisan power grab involved in granting DC statehood.

https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/why-dont-americans-want-d-c-to-be-a-state/


It'd be interesting to see what the Dems do if they come up with an actual proposal (maps, sample state constitution, etc.) At the moment, I think a lot of people don't like the idea of the Capitol, WH, etc. being part of a state. The key is to create a compelling narrative for why it should be a state so that you can hide the obvious power grab that it entails.
Member
Posts: 52,226
Joined: Jan 3 2009
Gold: 8,902.00
Oct 28 2020 03:27am
Quote (Plaguefear @ Oct 27 2020 09:49pm)
Only to someone without an ounce of intelligence.


You mean milliliter, right?
Member
Posts: 54,184
Joined: May 26 2005
Gold: 4,945.67
Oct 28 2020 03:27am
Quote (thundercock @ 28 Oct 2020 11:07)
It'd be interesting to see what the Dems do if they come up with an actual proposal (maps, sample state constitution, etc.) At the moment, I think a lot of people don't like the idea of the Capitol, WH, etc. being part of a state. The key is to create a compelling narrative for why it should be a state so that you can hide the obvious power grab that it entails.


If Dems win a trifecta with a large-enough cushion in the Senate, why would they care?

1. there is no guarantee that pushing through DC statehood would really increase the blowback during a Biden midterm in a meaningful way.
2. why would they care? DC statehood would be irreversible. even if this was the factor that causes them to lose the 2022 midterms (which is far from certain), it would still be worth it to lose one midterm election for gaining 2 additional senate seats permanently. and unlike with court packing, Republicans have no obvious answer to retaliate/counterbalance against DC statehood once they gain back control.

This post was edited by Black XistenZ on Oct 28 2020 03:29am
Member
Posts: 52,226
Joined: Jan 3 2009
Gold: 8,902.00
Oct 28 2020 03:31am
Quote (thundercock @ Oct 27 2020 09:57pm)
I don't know to be honest. Perhaps there is a worry that DC would have too much influence on Maryland politics and they'd lose their identity. To me, that was the most sensible thing to do but it polls in the low 20s. Anyway, the reality is that Republicans would be hurt by this but I don't think that is a good enough reason to keep people disenfranchised.


The people aren't disenfranchised. People get representatives (which DC has), states get senators. Senators aren't in Congress to represent people, they represent the interests of the state itself.
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev1383940414246Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll