Quote (SylvesterStallone @ 11 Jul 2021 10:51)
" :blush:
]https://i.postimg.cc/bJ1gzygs/Screenshot-20210711-093454-com-facebook-katana-edit-354061193512640.jpg
No serious scientist ever claimed that the vaccines would provide 100% protection against infection, transmission to others or even death. The key point is that the vaccines reduce the risk of hospitalization as well as the rate of transmission by the vaccinated to others by a big factor. And they reduce the risk of death to almost (but not exactly) zero.
If 0.05% or so of the fully vaccinated who get infected die, predominantly the old and/or multimorbid, then that's a socially acceptable death toll. Of course no public figure will be blunt enough to say this loud. Similarly, if the vaccines provide a 93% or so protection against hospitalization, this pretty much eliminates the risk of overwhelming the healthcare system once 80+% of the adults aged 40+ have been fully vaccinated.
The big problem right now is that the vaccination campaign is stalling at a rate which, by itself, is still too low to prevent the scenario of overwhelmed hospitals once the next wave soars up this coming fall/winter. That's why all the public figures and experts are using alarmist language right now. It takes a minimum of 5 weeks between the first jab and being fully protected, so the timing doesn't pan out if we wait until hospitals start cracking under the pressure again.
If we wait until we have 200k+ daily cases again in early November, it's too late for those who are currently reluctant or simply too lazy, to realize their mistake and get vaccinated. A change of heart at that point in time will come too late to stop the ongoing wave before it overwhelms the hospitals. At that point, the only options left would be new lockdowns or triaging those who are unvaccinated without medical excuse. (I, of course, strongly prefer the latter...)
This post was edited by Black XistenZ on Jul 11 2021 05:20am