take your meds

I think I need to switch to whatever brand you are taking, they seem fun

This post was edited by DizzyBusiness on Nov 18 2023 05:29pm

A very controversial person: pro-Bristish Scottish nationalist, a royal cuck with attitude

Gotta experiment with them!

I always chuckle when people do not know the difference between the UK, GB, and England

White people all look the same to be fair

What’s your estimate for Ukranian losses then?

Try to justify your position without use of visual aids or racism.

First you have to exactly definie "losses". We can read "eliminated", "liquidated", "kaputed"... It can be:

A- Dead
B- Crippled, unable to fight for ever for at least ~6 months
C- Temporarly wounded
D- CIVILIANS

I guess i know that:

- Russians seems to don't take care about their wounded as much as Ukrainians do.
- Ukrainians are not pushing for massive self destruction tactics; this is why they slowed down early in counter offensive when they realized it was full of mines & trenches.
- On the contrary Russians are applying terrible meat wave sacrificial ceremonies where they stop when 80% are dead. Retreating before == Getting shot by special russian sections.
- Oryx report exposes a large difference in the destruction rate of equipments, vehicles.
- There's definitely a "disposable" soldiers class in Russia along with historical prisonners massive sacrifices / meat waves (and poor structure with no non-commissioned officer)

In absolute numbers i remember i read often about ~~70k (now maybe 75-80) casualties on Ukrainian side (militaries)
In the same way i read often about more than ~~300k casualties on Russian side.
Both apparently are A + B or ... Just A. I am not sure.

Btw it fits the a loss exchange ratio + bad policies from russia (sacrifice religion + leaving wounded behind) like 3:1 going to 4:1


Good luck bon appetit

This post was edited by Meanwhile on Nov 19 2023 07:27am

What makes you think that 70k losses in 20+ months of this pretty bloody conflict is not a propaganda number?