Quote (ofthevoid @ Oct 2 2023 12:55pm)
>He's in contact with Russians handlers that's why he's giving Ukraine Starlink for free (which is undisputable their main com system and is sophisticated enough to actually not get jammed like most other things)
Such warped logic.
He cut Starlink coverage over areas like Crimea to prevent escalatory actions. If your wild theory was believable why would he maintain coverage all across the front?
He's for free speech, that's obvious, and the real reason why most on the left is so bothered by him is he's public in exposing the left slanted bias in social media. Not only talking but actual evidence.
You need to work on your reading comprehension. I said he gave Starlink to Ukraine for the public brownie points, then made contact with Russian affiliated people, then cut it off to help Russia, then turned it back on after intervention from the DoD.
This is pretty undeniably what happened. We literally have photos of him with the Russian aligned individuals who fed him talking points.
You tend to do this a lot. Just kind of passively absorb an opinion, never check it, then misrepresent anybody who corrects you. You did it when a math teacher told you evolution wasn't science and I corrected you, and you're doing it again. It's honestly the only way you seem to actually take in information. Passively and uncritically.
This post was edited by NetflixAdaptationWidow on Oct 2 2023 11:58am