d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > Russiagate Gathering Steam?
Prev1358359360361362445Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 50,874
Joined: Jan 20 2010
Gold: 5,846.00
Feb 4 2019 07:17pm




CNN had a copy of the Roger Stone indictment the day before he was arrested, before the document itself was submitted to the court, authored by Andrew A. Weissmann
Only Weissmann or someone in the special counsel's office with access to Weissmann's files could have gotten the document before it was even submitted to the court under seal

And anyone familiar with Andrew "Withhold the exculpatory evidence" Weissmann's history knows he's dogged by ethics violations and has a huge hate-boner for Trump. I've always said that the fact Mueller brought Weissmann onto his team is a serious reason to doubt Mueller's legitimacy and impartiality. But here it looks pretty clear that Weissmann was leaking special counsel materials to CNN. There's no other good explanation.

This post was edited by Goomshill on Feb 4 2019 07:24pm
Member
Posts: 66,666
Joined: May 17 2005
Gold: 17,384.69
Feb 5 2019 01:32am
Quote (Goomshill @ 5 Feb 2019 02:17)
https://i.imgur.com/NcDZMHh.jpg
https://i.imgur.com/F7gNyCP.jpg
https://i.redd.it/9c7i1jii7ne21.jpg

CNN had a copy of the Roger Stone indictment the day before he was arrested, before the document itself was submitted to the court, authored by Andrew A. Weissmann
Only Weissmann or someone in the special counsel's office with access to Weissmann's files could have gotten the document before it was even submitted to the court under seal

And anyone familiar with Andrew "Withhold the exculpatory evidence" Weissmann's history knows he's dogged by ethics violations and has a huge hate-boner for Trump. I've always said that the fact Mueller brought Weissmann onto his team is a serious reason to doubt Mueller's legitimacy and impartiality. But here it looks pretty clear that Weissmann was leaking special counsel materials to CNN. There's no other good explanation.



Is it illegal ?


https://www.nytimes.com/2017/10/31/us/politics/andrew-weissmann-mueller.html

-------------


New York prosecutors seek records from Trump inauguration committee

https://abcnews.go.com/beta-story-container/Politics/york-prosecutors-seek-records-trump-inauguration-committee-sources/story?id=60841246

This post was edited by Saucisson6000 on Feb 5 2019 01:37am
Member
Posts: 49,893
Joined: Jun 19 2006
Gold: 3.88
Feb 5 2019 02:10am
Quote (Goomshill @ Feb 5 2019 12:17pm)
https://i.imgur.com/NcDZMHh.jpg
https://i.imgur.com/F7gNyCP.jpg
https://i.redd.it/9c7i1jii7ne21.jpg

CNN had a copy of the Roger Stone indictment the day before he was arrested, before the document itself was submitted to the court, authored by Andrew A. Weissmann
Only Weissmann or someone in the special counsel's office with access to Weissmann's files could have gotten the document before it was even submitted to the court under seal

And anyone familiar with Andrew "Withhold the exculpatory evidence" Weissmann's history knows he's dogged by ethics violations and has a huge hate-boner for Trump. I've always said that the fact Mueller brought Weissmann onto his team is a serious reason to doubt Mueller's legitimacy and impartiality. But here it looks pretty clear that Weissmann was leaking special counsel materials to CNN. There's no other good explanation.


Anyone could have edited this info.
Member
Posts: 18,491
Joined: Sep 2 2008
Gold: 0.00
Feb 5 2019 04:26am
Quote (Plaguefear @ Feb 5 2019 08:10am)
Anyone could have edited this info.


more buttery males antics
Member
Posts: 30,165
Joined: Sep 10 2004
Gold: 0.00
Warn: 30%
Feb 5 2019 07:52am
Member
Posts: 38,137
Joined: May 28 2006
Gold: 0.00
Feb 5 2019 07:57am
solid cocklusion confirming evidence in last 3 posts
Member
Posts: 49,289
Joined: Jun 18 2006
Gold: 11.77
Feb 5 2019 08:07am
Quote (Goomshill @ Feb 4 2019 08:17pm)
https://i.imgur.com/NcDZMHh.jpg
https://i.imgur.com/F7gNyCP.jpg
https://i.redd.it/9c7i1jii7ne21.jpg

CNN had a copy of the Roger Stone indictment the day before he was arrested, before the document itself was submitted to the court, authored by Andrew A. Weissmann
Only Weissmann or someone in the special counsel's office with access to Weissmann's files could have gotten the document before it was even submitted to the court under seal

And anyone familiar with Andrew "Withhold the exculpatory evidence" Weissmann's history knows he's dogged by ethics violations and has a huge hate-boner for Trump. I've always said that the fact Mueller brought Weissmann onto his team is a serious reason to doubt Mueller's legitimacy and impartiality. But here it looks pretty clear that Weissmann was leaking special counsel materials to CNN. There's no other good explanation.


The Special Counsel is working with the DC USAO so assuming that it was someone in Mueller's office is unfounded. Also it seems possible to me that the FBI office in Florida would've had the document.

Every reputable journalist in Washington says the SC team doesn't leak. Why would they suddenly break that standard just to give CNN a heads up on Roger Stone getting arrested?
Member
Posts: 49,289
Joined: Jun 18 2006
Gold: 11.77
Feb 5 2019 09:01am
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/02/04/us/politics/trump-inaugural-committee-subpoena.html

Quote
Escalating one of the investigations into President Trump’s inaugural committee, federal prosecutors ordered on Monday that its officials turn over documents about donors, finances and activities, according to two people familiar with the inquiry.

The subpoena seeks documents related to all of the committee’s donors and guests; any benefits handed out, including tickets and photo opportunities with the president; federal disclosure filings; vendors; contracts; and more, one of the people said.

The new requests expand an investigation prosecutors opened late last year amid a flurry of scrutiny of the inaugural committee. And they showed that the investigations surrounding Mr. Trump, once centered on potential ties to Russia during the 2016 presidential election, have spread far beyond the special counsel’s office to include virtually all aspects of his adult life: his business, his campaign, his inauguration and his presidency.

In the subpoena, investigators also showed interest in whether any foreigners illegally donated to the committee, as well as whether committee staff members knew that such donations were illegal, asking for documents laying out legal requirements for donations. Federal law prohibits foreign contributions to federal campaigns, political action committees and inaugural funds.

Prosecutors also requested all documents related to vendors and contractors with the inaugural committee, which raised a record $107 million and spent lavishly.


This is SDNY, not Mueller.
Member
Posts: 92,984
Joined: Dec 31 2007
Gold: 2,299.94
Feb 5 2019 09:20am
Quote (IceMage @ Feb 5 2019 09:01am)


Quote
Prosecutors also requested all documents related to vendors and contractors with the inaugural committee, which raised a record $107 million and spent lavishly.


lol, trump, a lifelong contractor who's been fucking over customers, city building codes, and subcontractors for decades.

there's about a 250% chance he did something illegal in that process. he will scapegoat it and pay a fine, but lol.
Member
Posts: 66,666
Joined: May 17 2005
Gold: 17,384.69
Feb 5 2019 09:23am
Also this one today:

The company that owns Donald Trump’s Scottish golf courses is being investigated by US prosecutors.

https://www.thetimes.co.uk/edition/scotland/trumps-scottish-finances-in-the-spotlight-tnrfhtcd7


-_-
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev1358359360361362445Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll