don't think you read what i said.

no to what? i didn't say that trump claimed he knew about the meeting before it happened.
he has made numerous comments on the subject in tweets though. it's rather obvious it didn't take him long to learn about it.

i also stated that trump didn't know the discussions of the meeting. as to what trump has stated.

so... i have no idea what you are even trying to say "no" to.

edit: i even gave you a worst case scenario against trump on this issue. you were unable to say what the issue was.
instead you point your finger at me and say "how can you like a liar? your point is now invalid."

This post was edited by tagged4nothing on Feb 1 2019 05:48pm

I don't know if you're mentally slow or just dishonest. You made some assertions that I refuted, and now you're pretending you never made them. I responded to your question, and you're pretending I didn't.

I don't have bad-faith discussions with randoms. Good day.

This post was edited by IceMage on Feb 1 2019 06:02pm

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2019/02/01/judge-weighs-gag-order-case-former-trump-adviser-roger-stone/2742330002/

Hopefully the judge issues a gag order. Otherwise, potential jurors will be faced with Roger Stone on Fox News every week until the trial.

The government thinks the trial won't happen until the fall. Right now it's DC USAO and Special Counsel attorneys... which shows you that Mueller may hand it off at some point. If the rationale behind a Special Counsel appointment is to shield it from executive branch interference... why wouldn't that also apply beyond the investigative stages? I suppose once indictments are flying it's less likely that a president would interfere.

So many mixed signals. It's conceivable to me that the campaign was up to their eyeballs in shady activity, but not enough for a conspiracy indictment. We should know in a month or two.

Mueller has nothing. Roger Stone is a troll

i've not gone back on what i've said. i've just restated what you didn't read.
you did answer 1 of 2 questions though, so you at least read some of it.

so why don't you go back this time... no to what? you said no and then answered my question anyway.
you then claimed i needed self-respect because of a suspicion of yours. it also appears that call wasn't to trump if you've read the link "you" provided. you've proven yourself that this "phone-call" is not even evidence for your particular case.

i gave you a worst case scenario. not only did you assume it to be 100% true, you immediately started talking shit that same post.
"full-blown"

collusion confirmed

Russian troll accounts purged by Twitter pushed Qanon and other conspiracy theories
https://www.nbcnews.com/tech/social-media/russian-troll-accounts-purged-twitter-pushed-qanon-other-conspiracy-theories-n966091

- One account identified by Twitter as a Russian troll account, @QuartneyChante, posed as an African-American woman. One of her tweets received more than 66,000 retweets....

The fucked cultists are already lying and posting false information / diversion all the time, eventually hiding behind false identity, but the the real trolls are definitely doing it version power9000.

This post was edited by Saucisson6000 on Feb 4 2019 02:25pm

did John Loliver coroborate this information ?

*collision confirmed