"Thanks for murdering thousands of innocent civilians in Poland!"

Wasn't the dude invited by the Canadian house speaker? Not Zelensky or Ukraine.



What is the point of your post?

This post was edited by Prox1m1ty on Sep 25 2023 10:34am

I'm pretty sure someone that's savvy with coding could look at a sample of 100-200 of his posts in this thread and create a bot that would be astoundingly representative. I mean he cycles through the same 4-5 types of responses at the very least on a weekly basis.

>Ruscism
>Picture of Utkin
>Random pic or video of some Russian being primitive or whatever
>Genocide
>Youtube video of goatee guy
>Pic or info copy pasted from ISW/British defense/Kyiv Post

L'ignorance crasse.

I believe so. Our government are a bunch of clowns so it doesn't surprise me. The LPC has no legitimacy (House speaker is a Liberal party Trudeau supporter)

So does the Jewish community need to do better denouncing Ukraine over this incident? Or for something else?

Or does the Jewish community need to better denouncing the Canadian parliament speaker?

I understand that alot of the motivation of the atrocities & support of Nazi Germany & Adolf Hitler from the Ukrainian nationalists comes from their oppression under Stalin/ the Holodomor. However that does not justify atrocities against Polish civilians (and Russian civilians) - this is pretty obvious.

I mean that the Jewish community needs to do better in denouncing the Ukrainian state in general, and denouncing all the financial support that Western countries are giving to this overtly Nazi state.

They denounced Canada/Parliament over this incident which is commendable. But they have been, shockingly, mostly silent with respect to the war/Ukrainian Nazi state in general.

The onus shouldn't be on the Jews to tell you that giving standing ovations to SS members is not good. There was a time when this type of conventional wisdom was clear and you didn't need someone to clarify it for you.

This post was edited by ofthevoid on Sep 25 2023 10:47am

Brics... Worth reading to understand their main problem.



Why is the BRICS organization unlikely to achieve anything useful in the future?

According to the document, the BRICS organization is unlikely to achieve anything useful in the future because its members do not agree on anything. The document states that the organization was never founded by its members, but rather by a finance guy who saw an opportunity to invest capital in bond markets in Brazil, Russia, India, and China. The document also notes that over 90% of the capital for the Development Bank formed by the BRICS comes from China, and that the countries involved have little trade with each other.
The document notes that India is a special case and does not like the idea of a global currency, while Russia thinks that everyone should use the ruble. Brazil's foreign policies are described as lacking substance, and the country does not trade with the other BRICS members. South Africa, which hosted a BRICS summit, is pretending to be neutral, and China is seen as having clear, nationalist, and domineering goals. The recent expansion of the organization to include six new members, including Iran, Saudi Arabia, and the United Arab Emirates, guarantees that the organization will be unable to have a meaningful energy policy due to the diametrically opposed positions of its members.
Finally, the document notes that Chinese President Xi Jinping did not see the organization as a useful vehicle and did not attend some of the opening ceremonies.

This is his point tho. I will definitely agree that autocracies simply can't cooperate the same way as democracies do. As simple as that.