you should read what CNN sources.
they are literally guilty of what they claim concord to be guilty of in this circumstance.

https://cdn.cnn.com/cnn/2019/images/01/30/2019-1-30concord.2.pdf

page 8-10 is really all you need to read to address the particular subject.
in short, CNN is making a big deal out of the way the tweet was phrased. it has little to do with the document and the request to disclose sensitive data.

bold=the statement of what info is included.
underlined=words taken out of context to mean the "full investigation"

on a side note to this circumstance. or actually... what you should have asked us with this info you gave us....
should concord be able to disclose sensitive material as requested to prepare for court? the answer is no according to recent handling of non-sensitive material.

I have no idea what you're talking about.

In a new court filing submitted Thursday, special counsel Robert Mueller is claiming that discovery of evidence in the case against Roger Stone — a longtime Trump adviser who was indicted on seven counts last week — is both "voluminous and complex."

https://assets.documentcloud.org/documents/5707496/Stone-Evidence-20190131.pdf

"It is composed of multiple hard drives containing several terabytes of information consisting of, among other things, FBI case reports, search warrant applications and results (e.g., Apple iCloud accounts and email accounts), bank and financial records, and the contents of numerous physical devices (e.g., cellular phones, computers, and hard drives). The communications contained in the iCloud accounts, email accounts, and physical devices span several years."

source; https://www.axios.com/mueller-investigation-roger-stone-discovery-evidence-27c758ae-c32f-4ea2-a4c8-1c54b9481c6e.html

==> I'm surprised that "Mueller probe is close to being completed" from Whitaker

This post was edited by Saucisson6000 on Jan 31 2019 12:54pm

lol that's funny.

the GOP cried that the guns weren't needed, all they needed to do was ask Stone to turn himself in. Then the takedown yields terrabytes of info, that Stone would have deleted for sure.


Roger Stone truly does seem to be an idiot of a human being. eeeeeesh

All this money over Facebook ads. lol

it worked didnt it

The ads? I guess. Personally, I have no problem with collusion, although I doubt it happened. I would personally vote for Vladimir Putin to annex the United States before turning it over to the Democrats. If anything, this whole investigation has just made me pro-Putin. He makes a good point when he says America interferes with elections all the time. If Russia did, at least they wouldn't go to war with us if their guy didn't win.

You're a fucking moron.

The US interferes with "elections" such as Putin or other dictators that host sham elections. At least that's what I've seen confirmed. It's been rumored that we've been trying to influence more "free" nations, but none that are in practice real democracies.

shit talking with a belgian buddy of mine about if US or belgium was better, my favorite argument he "said atleast belgians are not blocking highways protesting a democratically elected leader"