d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > Russia / Ukraine
Prev1354835493550355135525001Next
Closed New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 28,875
Joined: Aug 11 2013
Gold: 10,712.00
Sep 22 2023 04:18pm
Quote (Santara @ Sep 22 2023 06:13pm)
Japan was under a highly effective blockade that made great shortages of fuel, food, and ammunition. Ukraine has aid pouring in from borders Russia can't touch. These are not analogous in the slightest.


You're not seeing the forest from the trees lol. If Russia nuked Ukraine, lets say they nuked Kiev, and idk Dnipro, the war would be over. The power apparatus would be gone and Ukraine lines in 2-3 months eventually become under-supplied and eventually non-existent.
Member
Posts: 52,224
Joined: Jan 3 2009
Gold: 8,902.00
Sep 22 2023 04:21pm
Quote (ofthevoid @ Sep 22 2023 05:18pm)
You're not seeing the forest from the trees lol. If Russia nuked Ukraine, lets say they nuked Kiev, and idk Dnipro, the war would be over. The power apparatus would be gone and Ukraine lines in 2-3 months eventually become under-supplied and eventually non-existent.


A tactical nuke is a low-yield, small blast radius weapon for battlefield use. Strategic weapons are the kind that level cities, and Russia has never threatened strategic nuke use, they've threatened tactical nukes. Putin's masters in China have assuredly informed him that such a thing would not be tolerated.

This post was edited by Santara on Sep 22 2023 04:22pm
Member
Posts: 4,147
Joined: Jun 30 2022
Gold: 6.42
Warn: 10%
Sep 22 2023 04:24pm
I really shouldn't have brought up the nuke thing again, I can't blame anyone but myself, I apologize to everyone. Brain hurts now.

This post was edited by DizzyBusiness on Sep 22 2023 04:24pm
Member
Posts: 28,875
Joined: Aug 11 2013
Gold: 10,712.00
Sep 22 2023 04:28pm
Quote (Santara @ Sep 22 2023 06:21pm)
A tactical nuke is a low-yield, small blast radius weapon for battlefield use. Strategic weapons are the kind that level cities, and Russia has never threatened strategic nuke use, they've threatened tactical nukes. Putin's masters in China have assuredly informed him that such a thing would not be tolerated.


If they are willing to use nukes, I probably wouldn't place my hope that they will ring fence themselves in only a specific type that's small and insignificant. At that point, it's an existential war and everything is on the table.

But again it's silly speculation of a highly unlikely scenario. It's also pretty silly to think China somehow has some ultimate sway how Russia behaves in an existential scenario.
Member
Posts: 45,718
Joined: Aug 25 2008
Gold: 40,130.00
Sep 22 2023 04:37pm
Quote (Santara @ 23 Sep 2023 06:21)
A tactical nuke is a low-yield, small blast radius weapon for battlefield use. Strategic weapons are the kind that level cities, and Russia has never threatened strategic nuke use, they've threatened tactical nukes. Putin's masters in China have assuredly informed him that such a thing would not be tolerated.


That is not an entirely true narrative. I can say without a doubt at least for the next 5 to 10 years , the Chinese are more fearful of the Russians and Putin than the Russians are to the Chinese.

Member
Posts: 66,666
Joined: May 17 2005
Gold: 17,384.69
Sep 22 2023 04:41pm
Quote (ofthevoid @ 23 Sep 2023 00:18)
You're not seeing the forest from the trees lol. If Russia nuked Ukraine, lets say they nuked Kiev, and idk Dnipro, the war would be over. The power apparatus would be gone and Ukraine lines in 2-3 months eventually become under-supplied and eventually non-existent.


Coping over a nuke attack when facing the reality of the 2nd army in the Wurld failure is a thing...

I would not be surprised if Ukraine has a team already working on dirty bomb/missiles/drones retaliation solution, making Moscow metropolitan area unhabitable. (25+ millions people)
Don't forget Ukraine already modified its neptune missiles and is also developping long range drones.

Imho deterrence is certainly not excluded from Ukrainian military "program". Maybe even before the main feb 2022 agression. When you have such barbaric and reckless regine just nearby...

First google result:
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-63373637

Case closed, it's a suicide for the Kremlin.
Member
Posts: 56,345
Joined: Jan 19 2007
Gold: 581,399.86
Sep 22 2023 04:44pm
Quote (Santara @ Sep 22 2023 10:58pm)
I am the one who said, and still assert, that the Russian military is incapable of exploiting a gap in a line made by a tactical nuke. This isn't a claim that a nuke won't do a lot of damage, it's a claim that the Russian military is not equipped to exploit it. First, the blast will have to be behind the front lines to avoid hitting their own lines, or if it hits on the lines, those lines will have to be abandoned in advance, leaving the Ukrainians to advance past the blast zone. Once a blast occurs, the area will be hazardous to both sides, and either side entering the fallout is going to need to move through it fast. But if it's contested by troops who move in from outside the blast zone, that movement is not likely to be swift enough.


it should not be hard for all sides to agree with Santara here.

Quote (DizzyBusiness @ Sep 22 2023 11:24pm)
I really shouldn't have brought up the nuke thing again, I can't blame anyone but myself, I apologize to everyone. Brain hurts now.


xD

This post was edited by ferdia on Sep 22 2023 04:45pm
Member
Posts: 52,224
Joined: Jan 3 2009
Gold: 8,902.00
Sep 22 2023 04:48pm
Quote (ofthevoid @ Sep 22 2023 05:28pm)
If they are willing to use nukes, I probably wouldn't place my hope that they will ring fence themselves in only a specific type that's small and insignificant. At that point, it's an existential war and everything is on the table.

But again it's silly speculation of a highly unlikely scenario. It's also pretty silly to think China somehow has some ultimate sway how Russia behaves in an existential scenario.


Tac nukes are not the top of the escalation scale. Aren't you one of the "muh escalations" crowd? Tac nukes do not mean Russia has decided it's in an existential crisis.

Quote (Hamsterbaby @ Sep 22 2023 05:37pm)
That is not an entirely true narrative. I can say without a doubt at least for the next 5 to 10 years , the Chinese are more fearful of the Russians and Putin than the Russians are to the Chinese.


Well, you're in better position to assess the Chinese public than I am. I just don't see such fears as justified. China is so much more massive militarily and economically. Throw in the fact that they represent one of the few unrestricted outlets for Russian trade goods, and all of a sudden, Chinese displeasure can matter greatly.
Member
Posts: 45,718
Joined: Aug 25 2008
Gold: 40,130.00
Sep 22 2023 04:53pm
Quote (ferdia @ 23 Sep 2023 06:44)
it should not be hard for all sides to agree with Santara here.



xD


Santara is not wrong on the Japan scenario though. But I think what we are missing is the Nukes that were dropped on the Japanese were 10 times less destructive that the ones that North Korea have at the moment.
Furthermore, the Atomic Bomb was just produced at the end of WW2 and effects and after effects of the nuclear fallout hasn't been studied and documented since it was the first time it is being used.

That being said if Nukes were used on Japan which it did, the fallout and contamination only affect Japan, the magnitude is not great enough at that moment to cause too much harm towards neighboring countries.

Now....if a Nuke is being used , and I am sure if the Russians really want to screw around, they will not use it in the Capital since it is closer to Belarus and Russia. Furthermore , once you destroy the command center , there will be no back channels available for further discussion of deescalation.

They will use it in places like Lviv or places closer to Poland where there is less population as an escalation to deescalate. :baby:
Member
Posts: 45,718
Joined: Aug 25 2008
Gold: 40,130.00
Sep 22 2023 04:57pm
Quote (Santara @ 23 Sep 2023 06:48)
Tac nukes are not the top of the escalation scale. Aren't you one of the "muh escalations" crowd? Tac nukes do not mean Russia has decided it's in an existential crisis.



Well, you're in better position to assess the Chinese public than I am. I just don't see such fears as justified. China is so much more massive militarily and economically. Throw in the fact that they represent one of the few unrestricted outlets for Russian trade goods, and all of a sudden, Chinese displeasure can matter greatly.


Well, I am not from China so there are a lot that I do not know. But staying in Hong Kong and traveling in and out of China for 13 years I do know their mood.

Put it this way, the first person that Xi Jinping paid a visit to when he was inaugurated was Putin. Russia is huge, any nuclear fall out on the Eastern side of their territory really doesn't matter much to them, but it matters to China, Mongolia, and if it go Far East, it will affect North and South Korea.
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev1354835493550355135525001Next
Closed New Topic New Poll