Quote (IceMage @ Jan 27 2019 12:58pm)
How do Trump cultists feel about Trump not being interviewed by Mueller?
There's a lot of talk about how the FBI treated Hillary differently because she was the Democrat nominee. Well, they did interview her in person. Why isn't the SC interviewing Trump? It seems like a huge double standard. He's provided written answers on a limited set of questions... would Republicans in the 90's accept written answers from Bill Clinton in the Ken Starr investigation? What is Trump trying to hide by avoiding an interview?
i'll answer on behalf of us cultists. it's a lot bigger a subject than something easily written. i'll give you the jist, but if you are actually curious... go watch those SC interviews including Wray/Rosenstein, Strzok.
it was the IG's report on the handling of the clinton and trump cases in the fbi. it ended with a very odd choice of words (that msm twisted a bit more to deny everything), but everything stated in the report itself had found numerous issues with the handling of the clinton case and start of the trump case.
hilary
was interviewed by peter strzok, but strzok called ahead of time and suggested wiping data from hard drives. (this is not the only issue with this just 1 example)
i was planning on re-watching these interviews again soon. if you plan to watch them you can literally skip every democratic speaker. they do not ask any questions related to the issue, all of them just bitch about ICE. (not even joking)
in short though, hilary got super special treatment for actual crimes that got swept out and ones that was never looked into. she was even charged in a circumstance, but fbi met with her lawyers to change the charge. i'll have to get back about which specific charge it was, but i remember it meant the same thing. only 1 was a criminal charge and 1 wasn't.
i'd also like to remind you that the kick-start to this investigation against trump was paid for by the clinton foundation. (that alone is pretty messed up giving the circumstance they were both running at that time)
trump is also current standing president. you might not like it, but you can't just drag him on investigations whenever you feel like it. if that was the case, dems would keep him in a court-like setting his full term.
if evidence was found of "trump" rigging the voting system in an astronomical way that stole the election, he wouldn't be keeping his seat.
in fairness though. hilary had a 15minute fbi investigation on her. trump has had 2 years with an investigation still on-going. so you could ask why the fbi didn't bother actually investigating her.