Quote (bogie160 @ 18 Sep 2023 07:38)
They're not Ukrainian territories, though, and I say that in the realest sense there is; they're not controlled by Ukraine, they are controlled by Russia, and the only country with a modicum of influence on the subject wants Russia to win.
I have provided a situation where Ukraine does not unconditionally surrender and yet obtains peace and security. I won't post it again, so feel free to go back and read it.
You've refused to answer the question. If Ukraine lacks the means to force Russia to pay reparations, and lacks the means to force Russia off the occupied and disputed territories (southern Ukraine and Crimea respectively), then what is Ukraine actually giving up in a peace compromise?
Quote (Goomshill @ 18 Sep 2023 09:18)
At no point since the US aligned revolutionary government took power by force has it held any valid claim to the seperatist regions. Tell me, how long has Taiwan been part of Communist China? The government in Kiev right now has never held any jurisdiction over Crimea or most of the DPR/LPR. They only took control of the west and Odessa. And despite ten years of slow burning siege against Putins little green men and a 1.75 years of open war, the Zelensky regime hasn't been able to plant a flag over regions which are now formally Russia oblasts.
Possession is nine tenths of the law. Russia possesses those territories, Zelensky never has. And we're marching towards the inevitability of status quo being locked in. This won't be an "I told you so" from Goomshill, this will be a "I told you before it started, every step of the way as it went downhill and on loop as it fell apart".
are you guys genuinely not aware that ukraine has existed BEFORE zelensky? again, those regions are not just acknowledged as ukrainian territories by the international community, but have been so by pootin himself - in various different treaties. military invasion followed by fake referendums, that no one recognises as legitimate, doesn't magically change that.