Quote (IceMage @ Apr 28 2021 07:14pm)
You're either too stupid to understand the nuance or arguing in bad faith.
"More fiscally conservative" or "less fiscally liberal" does not necessarily qualify a party as "fiscally conservative". You just mentioned a Republican plan to spend 600b on infrastructure... how are they doing it? Are they raising taxes and cutting spending somewhere? Is this another example of raising spending and hiking the deficit that somehow shows Republicans are fiscally conservative?
If you think raising spending and raising the deficit qualifies as fiscal conservatism because the other major party would increase both more, that logic makes no sense to me, and I'd like to see a single serious conservative who has argued that position.
So obtuse. Fiscal conservatism doesn't mean that spending is zero. This may be news to you but republican legislators were funding social services, having parks built, building roads through debt. The 600b package would be funded by whatever is collected in taxes and then the rest would be debt but the standard for fiscal conservatism is not 0 deficit, that's just your idiotic imposition that isn't based on anything empirical.
I've explained the nuance to you about half a dozen times now. The way to get to balance budgets or fiscal responsibility or whatever is to lower both of the levels of spending and taxation according to fiscal conservatism. These are fundamental principles that have been part of the republican party for decades and what makes up the backbone of fiscal conservatism. Evident in dozens of spending packages we can go through one by one.
Imagine being so dense to believe that higher taxes could be a tenant of what makes up fiscal conservatism if we play with some what-if. It's like we live in the upside down.
Like open your eyes and do some basic research go read through some of the past budgets. Go read what each party proposed.
This post was edited by ofthevoid on Apr 28 2021 07:54pm