d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > Russia / Ukraine
Prev1348434853486348734884527Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 30,078
Joined: Oct 25 2005
Gold: 3,691.36
Warn: 10%
Sep 14 2023 02:26pm
Quote (DizzyBusiness @ Sep 14 2023 04:13pm)
Yes

Because he needs ammo?


Lol. OK. I'm sure you are right.
Member
Posts: 4,145
Joined: Jun 30 2022
Gold: 4.91
Warn: 20%
Sep 14 2023 02:29pm
Quote (said_aouita @ Sep 14 2023 05:26pm)
Lol. OK. I'm sure you are right.


Good chat
Member
Posts: 17,397
Joined: Oct 23 2003
Gold: 19,381.95
Sep 14 2023 02:50pm
Quote (Djunior @ Sep 14 2023 12:43pm)
Nope the war is a disaster for both sides and I said from the beginning that there should've been negotiations before hostilities broke out. Somehow NATO wasn't interested in negotiations, did it perhaps have something to do with the statements made at the 2008 NATO summit? :o


so if you agree that Russia shouldnt have invaded and should pull out , what are we arguing about?
Member
Posts: 52,469
Joined: May 26 2005
Gold: 4,404.67
Sep 14 2023 03:41pm
Quote (Djunior @ 14 Sep 2023 19:50)
The sanctions backfired, it's a simple fact. Quite possibly the EU has lost access to cheap Russian energy forever.

https://i.imgur.com/vT4d6p5.jpg

The economic sanctions were a mistake. And just for the record: I was against them since the get go.

There is, however, a difference between my position of "the economic sanctions do hurt Russia, but not to a sufficient degree to justify the pain they inflict on ourselves" and your exaggerated propaganda position of "the Western sanctions are the greatest failure in the history of mankind, they barely tickle Russia while the West is on course toward economic collapse without cheap Russian energy".

Furthermore, it can't be stressed often enough that it was Russia which shut down the gas pipelines. This happened before the NS pipelines got blown up, and it happened at a time when natural gas was not subject to sanctions yet; Germany (and other European countries) were still happily receiving the Russian gas at the time.

This post was edited by Black XistenZ on Sep 14 2023 03:42pm
Member
Posts: 52,469
Joined: May 26 2005
Gold: 4,404.67
Sep 14 2023 03:55pm
Quote (Djunior @ 14 Sep 2023 21:25)
-Core part of the USSR
-Home to large ethnic Russian minority
-Home to Crimea / Sevastopol / Russian naval base
-Borders Russia, hugely decreasing the distance between NATO and Moscow in the case Ukraine becomes NATO member


- The distance from Ukraine to Moscow is about the same as the distance from the Estonian border to Moscow. Estonia has been a NATO member since 2004.
- Russia already controled Crimea/Sevastopol and the ethnic Russian regions of Ukraine before Feburary 2022.

So these points don't give a valid reason why Russia had to invade the rest of Ukraine at all, nor why it had to happen in Feb 22. The previous status quo already served their (purported) interests: control Crimea/Sevastopol, create a frozen conflict in the Donbass which indefinitely prevents Ukraine from joining NATO or the EU.
Member
Posts: 66,666
Joined: May 17 2005
Gold: 17,384.69
Sep 14 2023 04:05pm
Quote (Black XistenZ @ 14 Sep 2023 23:41)
The economic sanctions were a mistake. And just for the record: I was against them since the get go. .


You are the one saying it, hopefully most of people think differently. Most of the sanctions is not avoided.
Member
Posts: 4,145
Joined: Jun 30 2022
Gold: 4.91
Warn: 20%
Sep 14 2023 04:06pm
Quote (Meanwhile @ Sep 14 2023 07:05pm)
You are the one saying it, hopefully most of people think differently. Most of the sanctions is not avoided.


Very wise words
Member
Posts: 19,885
Joined: Apr 13 2016
Gold: 32,502.50
Warn: 10%
Sep 14 2023 04:13pm
Quote (Black XistenZ @ Sep 14 2023 10:41pm)
The economic sanctions were a mistake. And just for the record: I was against them since the get go.

There is, however, a difference between my position of "the economic sanctions do hurt Russia, but not to a sufficient degree to justify the pain they inflict on ourselves" and your exaggerated propaganda position of "the Western sanctions are the greatest failure in the history of mankind, they barely tickle Russia while the West is on course toward economic collapse without cheap Russian energy".

Furthermore, it can't be stressed often enough that it was Russia which shut down the gas pipelines. This happened before the NS pipelines got blown up, and it happened at a time when natural gas was not subject to sanctions yet; Germany (and other European countries) were still happily receiving the Russian gas at the time.


There really isn't any alternative to cutting imports from Russia; As much as possible, and for as long as Russia uses trade capital to wage wars of aggression.

Quote (Black XistenZ @ Sep 14 2023 10:55pm)
- The distance from Ukraine to Moscow is about the same as the distance from the Estonian border to Moscow. Estonia has been a NATO member since 2004.
- Russia already controled Crimea/Sevastopol and the ethnic Russian regions of Ukraine before Feburary 2022.

So these points don't give a valid reason why Russia had to invade the rest of Ukraine at all, nor why it had to happen in Feb 22. The previous status quo already served their (purported) interests: control Crimea/Sevastopol, create a frozen conflict in the Donbass which indefinitely prevents Ukraine from joining NATO or the EU.


Well put.

This post was edited by Prox1m1ty on Sep 14 2023 04:14pm
Member
Posts: 66,666
Joined: May 17 2005
Gold: 17,384.69
Sep 14 2023 04:17pm
Quote (DizzyBusiness @ 15 Sep 2023 00:06)
Very wise words


Russia therefore failed to accumulate as much Western material as before the war, while its income from fossil fuels diminished.
The Russian population also pays the high price following the fall of the ruble and the rise in the price of imports.

It is not brilliant, like this german minister said: it's not possoble to stop a war with sanctions... But the effect is real and the most import: the sooner the better.
If the Russian economy has so far not collapsed, it is weakened.
Member
Posts: 4,145
Joined: Jun 30 2022
Gold: 4.91
Warn: 20%
Sep 14 2023 04:58pm
Poroshenko is very stylish :o

Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev1348434853486348734884527Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll