Quote (thesnipa @ Jan 17 2019 03:34pm)
i'm frankly at a loss why people are so intent on politicizing the FISA stuff. we got exposed, our FISA standards across the board were shit. All you needed was a sticky note saying someone smelled like a witch and boom, warrant stamped. since then i've heard of no worthwhile changes to the FISA courts, just political sniping. and the elites who maintained a tool well outside of the 4th amendment sit back and smile, they kept their catchall.
because since 9/11, although our country has managed to completely shit all over civil rights and privacy with rubber stamp processes to allow mass surveillance, it has maintained the fragile safety net of insulating the spying apparatus from being weaponized for partisan political purposes. We were quite happy to dragnet spy on anyone and everyone as long as it was just being used to watch Ahmed through a laptop camera while he jerks off to goat porn in case he plans a terrorist attack. But until the Trump campaign, there's been no allegations of politicians spying on another- which was a pretty proud accomplishment considering LBJ spied on Nixon, Nixon spied on democrats, Reagan & Bush spied on Carter, etc. We actually had multiple layers of quarantine to separate surveillance from politics, no doubt helped by the fact that those protects were created by the people being protected. The whole 'masking' thing for example. But nobody said anything about Bush/Obama/Romney/McCain/etc.
None of the politicians actually want to challenge our surveillance state, but they're all wary about getting Flynn'd by a hoover-esque FBI.