d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > Russiagate Gathering Steam?
Prev1345346347348349445Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 50,893
Joined: Jan 20 2010
Gold: 5,836.00
Jan 17 2019 03:31pm
Quote (Surfpunk @ Jan 17 2019 03:27pm)
Except the dossier wasn't "a product of Democratic campaign research". It was initially Republican oppo research which rolled over to Democratic oppo after the primaries were all but over (don't believe me, read the transcript of Glenn Simpson's testimony to the SJC - I have read the entire thing: https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/4345537-Fusion-GPS-Simpson-Transcript.html).


and has been debunked a million times, Christopher Steele was not retained to produce the dossier until after the republicans had dropped them and democrats had picked them up, meaning the funding came from democrats alone. And your opinion on such a quibble doesn't matter as much as Bruce Ohr's opinion, because he's the person who explicitly told the FBI leadership that Steele produced the Dossier using democratic campaign bucks and had a raging hate-boner for Trump. Which completely flies in the face of the democrat's deflection from the FISA dossier in which they claimed that Ohr never talked to the FBI prior to the election and the FBI had no idea of Steele's bias.
Member
Posts: 32,103
Joined: Dec 29 2009
Gold: 0.00
Jan 17 2019 03:33pm
Quote (Goomshill @ Jan 17 2019 03:31pm)
and has been debunked a million times, Christopher Steele was not retained to produce the dossier until after the republicans had dropped them and democrats had picked them up, meaning the funding came from democrats alone. And your opinion on such a quibble doesn't matter as much as Bruce Ohr's opinion, because he's the person who explicitly told the FBI leadership that Steele produced the Dossier using democratic campaign bucks and had a raging hate-boner for Trump. Which completely flies in the face of the democrat's deflection from the FISA dossier in which they claimed that Ohr never talked to the FBI prior to the election and the FBI had no idea of Steele's bias.


The data/info that built it though went back to 2015.
Member
Posts: 92,984
Joined: Dec 31 2007
Gold: 2,299.94
Jan 17 2019 03:34pm
Quote (Goomshill @ Jan 17 2019 03:31pm)
and has been debunked a million times, Christopher Steele was not retained to produce the dossier until after the republicans had dropped them and democrats had picked them up, meaning the funding came from democrats alone. And your opinion on such a quibble doesn't matter as much as Bruce Ohr's opinion, because he's the person who explicitly told the FBI leadership that Steele produced the Dossier using democratic campaign bucks and had a raging hate-boner for Trump. Which completely flies in the face of the democrat's deflection from the FISA dossier in which they claimed that Ohr never talked to the FBI prior to the election and the FBI had no idea of Steele's bias.


i'm frankly at a loss why people are so intent on politicizing the FISA stuff. we got exposed, our FISA standards across the board were shit. All you needed was a sticky note saying someone smelled like a witch and boom, warrant stamped. since then i've heard of no worthwhile changes to the FISA courts, just political sniping. and the elites who maintained a tool well outside of the 4th amendment sit back and smile, they kept their catchall.
Member
Posts: 66,666
Joined: May 17 2005
Gold: 17,384.69
Jan 17 2019 03:39pm
This poor Rudy should definitely not be here :o
Maybe he's sharing a dirty stick with Donald or something like this.
Member
Posts: 50,893
Joined: Jan 20 2010
Gold: 5,836.00
Jan 17 2019 03:44pm
Quote (thesnipa @ Jan 17 2019 03:34pm)
i'm frankly at a loss why people are so intent on politicizing the FISA stuff. we got exposed, our FISA standards across the board were shit. All you needed was a sticky note saying someone smelled like a witch and boom, warrant stamped. since then i've heard of no worthwhile changes to the FISA courts, just political sniping. and the elites who maintained a tool well outside of the 4th amendment sit back and smile, they kept their catchall.


because since 9/11, although our country has managed to completely shit all over civil rights and privacy with rubber stamp processes to allow mass surveillance, it has maintained the fragile safety net of insulating the spying apparatus from being weaponized for partisan political purposes. We were quite happy to dragnet spy on anyone and everyone as long as it was just being used to watch Ahmed through a laptop camera while he jerks off to goat porn in case he plans a terrorist attack. But until the Trump campaign, there's been no allegations of politicians spying on another- which was a pretty proud accomplishment considering LBJ spied on Nixon, Nixon spied on democrats, Reagan & Bush spied on Carter, etc. We actually had multiple layers of quarantine to separate surveillance from politics, no doubt helped by the fact that those protects were created by the people being protected. The whole 'masking' thing for example. But nobody said anything about Bush/Obama/Romney/McCain/etc.

None of the politicians actually want to challenge our surveillance state, but they're all wary about getting Flynn'd by a hoover-esque FBI.
Member
Posts: 49,289
Joined: Jun 18 2006
Gold: 11.77
Jan 17 2019 03:49pm
I can't believe Steele was biased against a man he thought was deeply compromised by Russia. Fucking libtards man.

If Trump isn't implicated in the conspiracy with Russia, I think Spygate will be Benghazi 2.0. Years of hearings with no indictments.

This post was edited by IceMage on Jan 17 2019 03:51pm
Member
Posts: 57,901
Joined: Dec 3 2008
Gold: 286.00
Jan 17 2019 05:29pm
Quote (IceMage @ Jan 17 2019 04:49pm)
I can't believe Steele was biased against a man he thought was deeply compromised by Russia. Fucking libtards man.

If Trump isn't implicated in the conspiracy with Russia, I think Spygate will be Benghazi 2.0. Years of hearings with no indictments.


Russia Collusion does indeed smell a lot like Benghazi.
Member
Posts: 92,984
Joined: Dec 31 2007
Gold: 2,299.94
Jan 17 2019 05:30pm
Quote (Goomshill @ Jan 17 2019 03:44pm)
because since 9/11, although our country has managed to completely shit all over civil rights and privacy with rubber stamp processes to allow mass surveillance, it has maintained the fragile safety net of insulating the spying apparatus from being weaponized for partisan political purposes. We were quite happy to dragnet spy on anyone and everyone as long as it was just being used to watch Ahmed through a laptop camera while he jerks off to goat porn in case he plans a terrorist attack. But until the Trump campaign, there's been no allegations of politicians spying on another- which was a pretty proud accomplishment considering LBJ spied on Nixon, Nixon spied on democrats, Reagan & Bush spied on Carter, etc. We actually had multiple layers of quarantine to separate surveillance from politics, no doubt helped by the fact that those protects were created by the people being protected. The whole 'masking' thing for example. But nobody said anything about Bush/Obama/Romney/McCain/etc.

None of the politicians actually want to challenge our surveillance state, but they're all wary about getting Flynn'd by a hoover-esque FBI.


>they're all bad
>[partisan sniping continues]
>everything is fine
Member
Posts: 29,003
Joined: Jun 20 2007
Gold: 34.51
Jan 17 2019 06:39pm
Just checking in, have we impeached or are we continuing to hemorrhage public money?
Member
Posts: 78,723
Joined: Nov 30 2008
Gold: 493.00
Jan 17 2019 07:05pm
Quote (SBD @ Jan 17 2019 07:39pm)
Just checking in, have we impeached or are we continuing to hemorrhage public money?


I wasn't aware saving tax dollars was a priority for anyone
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev1345346347348349445Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll