d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > Russia / Ukraine
Prev1345034513452345334544540Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 14,775
Joined: Jun 27 2010
Gold: 100,701.50
Sep 8 2023 12:03pm
Member
Posts: 29,869
Joined: May 25 2007
Gold: 2,075.69
Sep 8 2023 12:05pm
Quote (Meanwhile @ Sep 8 2023 10:55am)
"
In a statement on X, the social media platform formerly known as Twitter, which Musk owns, the Ukrainian presidential adviser Mykhailo Podolyak wrote that Musk’s interference led to the deaths of civilians, calling them “the price of a cocktail of ignorance and big ego”.
“By not allowing Ukrainian drones to destroy part of the Russian fleet via Starlink interference, @elonmusk allowed this fleet to fire Kalibr missiles at Ukrainian cities. As a result, civilians, and children are being killed,” Podolyak wrote.
"

I guess ruscists will prefer a russian warship over a city - As simple as that -


"By refusing to participate in and facilitate acts of murder and war, Elon is guilty of killing children!"

Great logic there. So you also believe that pacifists are guilty of murder themselves because they refuse to participate in war?
Member
Posts: 43,574
Joined: Aug 25 2008
Gold: 50,415.00
Sep 8 2023 12:08pm
Quote (El1te @ 9 Sep 2023 02:05)
"By refusing to participate in and facilitate acts of murder and war, Elon is guilty of killing children!"

Great logic there. So you also believe that pacifists are guilty of murder themselves because they refuse to participate in war?


It is probably too french for us to fathom.
Member
Posts: 30,165
Joined: Sep 10 2004
Gold: 0.00
Warn: 30%
Sep 8 2023 12:11pm
Quote (El1te @ 8 Sep 2023 20:00)
Okay so just you just refuse to listen to reason and dismiss anything that doesn't fit your narrative as fake news

These are the facts: there are no good guys in this Ukraine vs Russia war. Both sides are guilty of war crimes. There is no moral posturing here. Might makes right in this circumstance.

Edit: So now you're also justifying these war crimes because of Russia moving in troops to support the self determination of the separatists. smh


silly bothsidesism. there might not be angels in this conflict, but only a pootlicker would deny the fact that russians are the aggressors, are the ones who INVADED A SOVEREIGN COUNTRY in order to CONQUER ITS TERRITORY. they are the ones killing innocent men, women, and children in a war of aggression. no moronic "b-b-but ukrainians are evil too" whataboutism will ever hide that simple truth.

that's like saying "the allies did war crimes too, and their conditions in the treaty of versailles basically forced the nazis into a war." - we can still determine which side is significantly worse than the other. here's a hint: it's the side that invades other countries and kills their people in order to conquer and annex their territory.

foh with your war apologist rhetoric.
Member
Posts: 29,869
Joined: May 25 2007
Gold: 2,075.69
Sep 8 2023 12:16pm
Quote (Hamsterbaby @ Sep 8 2023 11:08am)
It is probably too french for us to fathom.


The French have been too war-like for too long. And it finally came back to bite them in the ass when Germany took their vengeance. A relic of Napoleonic Caesarism perhaps, or the barbarity of the revolution. Bring back the honourable French Monarchy and the country is fixed :)
Member
Posts: 29,869
Joined: May 25 2007
Gold: 2,075.69
Sep 8 2023 12:18pm
Quote (fender @ Sep 8 2023 11:11am)
silly bothsidesism. there might not be angels in this conflict, but only a pootlicker would deny the fact that russians are the aggressors, are the ones who INVADED A SOVEREIGN COUNTRY in order to CONQUER ITS TERRITORY. they are the ones killing innocent men, women, and children in a war of aggression. no moronic "b-b-but ukrainians are evil too" whataboutism will ever hide that simple truth.

that's like saying "the allies did war crimes too, and their conditions in the treaty of versailles basically forced the nazis into a war." - we can still determine which side is significantly worse than the other. here's a hint: it's the side that invades other countries and kills their people in order to conquer and annex their territory.

foh with your war apologist rhetoric.


You saying "bothsidesism" doesn't invalidate the truth that yes, both sides here are bad. You tacking on -ism does not constitute a valid argument.

Who's territory is whose is not set in stone, and is a matter of perspective. By your logic, is Mexico justified in invading Texas and the southern states because the territory used to be theirs? Do you believe the USA should concede the territory they gained (by invasion) in the Mexican-American war?

Edit: the conditions of the Treaty of Versailles DID essentially force the Germans into war, as it was unjust and malicious. This is the academically accepted view. Carthaginian peace does not work, and is not peace at all - it's an act of war in itself. Germany considered themselves to still be at war.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carthaginian_peace

This post was edited by El1te on Sep 8 2023 12:24pm
Member
Posts: 14,775
Joined: Jun 27 2010
Gold: 100,701.50
Sep 8 2023 12:27pm
Quote (fender @ Sep 8 2023 08:11pm)
silly bothsidesism. there might not be angels in this conflict, but only a pootlicker would deny the fact that russians are the aggressors, are the ones who INVADED A SOVEREIGN COUNTRY in order to CONQUER ITS TERRITORY. they are the ones killing innocent men, women, and children in a war of aggression. no moronic "b-b-but ukrainians are evil too" whataboutism will ever hide that simple truth.

that's like saying "the allies did war crimes too, and their conditions in the treaty of versailles basically forced the nazis into a war." - we can still determine which side is significantly worse than the other. here's a hint: it's the side that invades other countries and kills their people in order to conquer and annex their territory.

foh with your war apologist rhetoric.


Correction: NATO triggered this war and are now very happy to supply Ukraine with everything it asks for including banned cluster munitions because they still insist they're going to reel in Ukraine.

Musk worried about triggering WW3 which is why he turned off Starlink, which was the right thing to do. Ukraine should be grateful with all the help Musk provided but they're biting the hand that feeds them, notice the trend?

BTW whataboutism getting old so now it's bothsidesism? :lol:

This post was edited by Djunior on Sep 8 2023 12:28pm
Member
Posts: 30,165
Joined: Sep 10 2004
Gold: 0.00
Warn: 30%
Sep 8 2023 12:27pm
Quote (El1te @ 8 Sep 2023 20:18)
You saying "bothsidesism" doesn't invalidate the truth that yes, both sides here are bad. You tacking on -ism does not constitute a valid argument.


uncritically stating "both sides are bad" only serves to downplay the crimes of the side that is worse. you're not being smart doing that, you're not being "technically correct", you're actively pushing the invading force's propaganda.

ukraine certainly wasn't too tender when REACTING to russian meddling (tons of unmarked troops, kremlin funding of pro-russian opposition...), of transparent russian attempts to create yet another flimsy casus belli (like they have done before in georgia or chechnya for example, literally the exact same playbook - and you still fall for it uncritically, lol), and they were criticised for it because innocent civilians did indeed die.

to use that REACTION TO RUSSIAN INTERFERENCE ON UKRAINIAN TERRITORY as an excuse to just equally blame "both sides" is nothing but hackery / propaganda though. russia is BY FAR the worse party, not only because they instigated "both" conflicts, but also because they LITERALLY INVADED A SOVEREIGN COUNTRY (multiple times) and keep MURDERING INNOCENT CIVILIANS BY THE THOUSANDS.

anyone who can't acknowledge that simple truth is either stupid beyond belief, or a russian propagandist (or likely both)...
Member
Posts: 19,887
Joined: Apr 13 2016
Gold: 32,502.50
Warn: 10%
Sep 8 2023 12:32pm
Quote (Djunior @ Sep 8 2023 06:38pm)
Correction: NATO or Elon Musk are responsible for sinking the flagship by providing all intel / coordinates needed for such attack, Ukraine does NOT have these capabilities.

If you don't understand this, don't even quote me


Ukraine launched the missile that sunk the Moskva. Why is it so hard for you to base yourself in reality?
Member
Posts: 29,869
Joined: May 25 2007
Gold: 2,075.69
Sep 8 2023 12:34pm
Quote (fender @ Sep 8 2023 11:27am)
uncritically stating "both sides are bad" only serves to downplay the crimes of the side that is worse. you're not being smart doing that, you're not being "technically correct", you're actively pushing the invading force's propaganda.

ukraine certainly wasn't too tender when REACTING to russian meddling (tons of unmarked troops, kremlin funding of pro-russian opposition...), of transparent russian attempts to create yet another flimsy casus belli (like they have done before in georgia or chechnya for example, literally the exact same playbook - and you still fall for it uncritically, lol), and they were criticised for it because innocent civilians did indeed die.

to use that REACTION TO RUSSIAN INTERFERENCE ON UKRAINIAN TERRITORY as an excuse to just equally blame "both sides" is nothing but hackery / propaganda though. russia is BY FAR the worse party, not only because they instigated "both" conflicts, but also because they LITERALLY INVADED A SOVEREIGN COUNTRY (multiple times) and keep MURDERING INNOCENT CIVILIANS BY THE THOUSANDS.

anyone who can't acknowledge that simple truth is either stupid beyond belief, or a russian propagandist (or likely both)...


You keep saying murdering innocent civilians while ignoring the fact that Ukrainians have also been murdering innocent civilians for over 8 years now in the Donbas

This post was edited by El1te on Sep 8 2023 12:34pm
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev1345034513452345334544540Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll