Quote (Saucisson6000 @ 1 Jul 2021 13:30)
"young being at risk" is not my point, I am simply pointing out that cancelling (or diminishing) distancing or even vaccination will increase the spread and then possible mutations within these young groups.
Later spreading to older generations: I am talking about ~35 or less, not 18-. Seems you are trying to restrict the problematic. Still addicated to the Grand Cull theory ? :lol:
We should of course not drop all restrictions before the vaccination campaign for the adults wraps up. But once this point is reached, the question of how to handle the unvaccinated children will become pressing, particularly with the start of the new school year in fall.
The options basically are:
1. keep schools open even with low vaccination rates among children.
2. force or pressure children into taking the vaccine.
3. close schools again when infection numbers among schoolchildren inevitably go up.
#3 is the worst option, so we will have to choose between subjecting our children to the vaccines or letzing them acquire immunity via natural infection.
They will not spread it to older generations btw, all serious studies show that schoolchildren are not the drivers of the spread. And even if they did, why should we care as long as the older generations have all been vaccinated (or are unvaccinated out of their own volition)?
Calling natural infections among an age group for which the virus has an Infection Fatality Rate (IFR) of less than 0.1 promille "The Great Cull" is inadequate and ridiculous.
This post was edited by Black XistenZ on Jul 1 2021 05:42am