What are you trying to say or infer here?

Genuine Question, with no follow ups intended on my part.

Hold Up

You're telling me that russians and ukrainians are both white?!

there are far more neo-Nazis among the pro-Russians

Putin's strategy of 'managed nationalism' has resulted in the radicalization of nationalist movements in Russia. The Kremlin has collaborated with far-right groups, including neo-Nazi organizations, to discredit and defeat political parties that oppose the regime. Evidence shows that Russian society and military have a far deeper problem with extremism than Ukraine. Putin's invasion of Ukraine is based on the false claim that Ukraine is ruled by neo-Nazis. However, Putin has a far bigger problem with extremism than Zelensky.

https://smallwarsjournal.com/jrnl/art/do-not-believe-putins-propaganda-there-are-far-more-neo-nazis-among-pro-russians

forget it, it's over.




It's just for self defense

It's almost as if the west hasn't guilt tripped their young white males into being feminized.

This post was edited by Mondain on Aug 20 2023 04:48pm

every person with a brain is well aware that while there are indeed neo-nazis in ukraine, there are significantly more in russia, including pootin's inner circle. only complete idiots / propagandists would still push the de-nazifying angle...

Wikipedia has a raging neoliberal bias, and before Ukraine became their pet proxy war, they were happy to call out the endemic Nazism in Ukraine, while after the war set in the page was sanitized and filled with talking points to diminish and excuse that Nazism. There's more information about "nazism in russia" in the page about them in Ukraine. Its just more of that revisionism and narrative sculpting

So what would be a better alternative to wikipedia? Is there a more fair and balanced online encyclopedia?

And yes, I also see the liberal bias you are talking about. Which is why I rarely use it, unless to look up my favorite singers/artists.

Infiltrated by US intelligence to manage the narrative as it fits.

No alternative. I m buying older prints of children story books by Roald Dahl and Enid Blyton soon. Within the next 5 to 10 years, if the Liberal hegemony is still going in full force, they will edit all the books , words they deem offensive and doesn't fit their agenda to something else.

This is a ingenious strategy as compared to destroying books and literature.

I don't think there's a non-biased alternative to most platforms given the monopolization of the internet and major corporations in general. If you don't like youtube's policies, you don't go use bitchute or whatever, you just use youtube and put up with its policies.