You're completely missing the point. It's not about justifying their actions it's about exposing your hypocrisy. The same people that have funded and pushed for this war in the west are the same ones that invaded Iraq, the same ones responsible for at least 3 other wars in the last 20 years. Hundreds of thousands dead, but no this time it's completely different! Thing is, none of these wars are genocides and you keep evading my questions on Iraq because it completely exposes your simple minded double standards here.



No one is dodging you lmao, was away, I don't sit here refreshing every 30 seconds for your comebacks.




It was ultimately about oil and Saddam has always been a thorn not behaving how we want him to. We don't actually care about murderous regimes, we only care about ones that are geopolitically against us. I mean look at Saudi Arabia's war in Yemen. We not only didn't care, but actually sold them billions of weapons to and supported it.

This post was edited by ofthevoid on Aug 19 2023 02:53pm

Although the esteemed French debater is an expert in ACE Combat series. Let me ask my school mate who was in SAF and who actually flew the F 16s what he thinks.

Furthermore USA should be giving A 10s instead of F 16s.

Russia’s lander experiences ‘emergency situation’ while approaching lunar surface.
https://edition.cnn.com/2023/08/19/world/russian-lunar-lander-emergency-luna-25-scn/index.html







=> it probably collided with one of the many Russian army T-90 turrets launched from Ukrainian territory over the last year.

Hmm yes I agree with this. Saddam was a good pretext for invasion, but they needed even more to have deniability of hypocrisy. So they added the WMDs as a second pretext

Facts are too much for this juvenile to understand. Maybe when he grows up.

No it isn't. All government systems have been showed to be deeply flawed, democracy included. The US is the exact opposite of what the founding fathers intended it to be due to the failures of democracy. All forms of government work to some degree but none of them are sustainable and all are corrupt.

I think what a lot of people do not understand is Democracy is a lot more harder to fix when it decays .

Monarchy is the most stable system by the objective facts of history, though there is still corruption present (corruption can be remedied in monarchies through the influence of the court & royal family)

Man what a Time you came in with this.

I was just listening to this on YouTube 2 hours back.
It comes down to the Great Emperor Theory. Quite interesting to be honest.

This is true but it's also the case that the majority of time monarchy was stable was a time when social pressures were weaker and technological progress that contributed to those pressures was effectively non-existent. I don't think monarchy has really been tested in modern society. It may be that it would remain a stable option. I have no facts to say otherwise, just doubts.