‘duhcrossbones’: “a Black man said something i didnt agree with so:”

al gore got the DOJ/Fake electors/etc? You saying it was the same thing?|
** let me add some more did he get DOJ involved then IGNORE the results.
** did he ask FL to find 1 vote more to change the election?
** did he try to change the electors results from the votes themselves?
** did he ignore the findings of any trial/judges they put the evidence through?
** did he create a false grifting scheme ? even though he KNEW he lost?
how is it even remotely the same thing?

This post was edited by theCrossbones on Jun 26 2022 10:00pm

fail again.. its not what I said..
again reference to the broad brush of "If its not implicit within the constitution it is not protected"
you can try again if you like.. its pretty amusing.

Did they both try to exhaust legal challenges to the election results?
Did they both allege irregularities with electronic voting machines?


Contesting the results of an election is not a crime, nor should it be, nor can it be in a free and fair democracy.

Its not the same sorry. I've spelled out many reasons why 3 times.. Even trumps team is calling BS.
if it was just those 2 points it might be the same but its NOT

Actually, I am.

This post was edited by Cascadian on Jun 27 2022 11:00am

It's Monday. Roe is still overturned.

There were riots in Seattle, Portland, and LA, none of which are impacted in any way by the decision, as the "right" to an abortion is established in the laws of all three States.

* Grabs more popcorn while watching the left destroy it's own cities for no reason whatsoever *

Can't believe I got suspended for my comments, looks like the stormfront ppl here are not built for prison after all

At a guess, judging by your most recently flagged post, your suspension was for posting explicit sexual acts. Not a good idea. Welcome back though.

Edit: LOL. Complaining about it seems to be an offense as well. Rough world.

Roe is still overturned, btw. Life hasn't ended, abortion is still legal up to the time of birth in my state. Wish they'd stop trying to burn down cities over a right they already have. :/

This post was edited by InsaneBobb on Jun 27 2022 06:46pm

A pretty reasonable point from Tucker I don't see raised much

The same corporations that are lining up to virtue signal their support for abortion and give large payouts to women seeking abortions to offset their costs, actually have a pretty clear perverse financial incentive to benefit from their young female employees having abortions instead of raising families. Which would give them maternal leave, lower their productivity, skyrocket their healthcare overhead. Having a workforce of women who choose to pursue their careers instead of family life means they have twice the workforce when added to men. And so Fox sent their emails to these corporations asking if they are expanding maternal benefits and offering the same kinds of "$4000 extra expenses paid" benefits to mothers who choose to have children instead of just those who get abortions. Naturally, no response