d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > Amy Coney Barrett Hearings
Prev1323334353646Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 34,649
Joined: Jul 2 2007
Gold: 273.37
Oct 27 2020 09:18am
Quote (Skinned @ Oct 27 2020 11:17am)
We know you hate journalism. Stay with infowars.


https://www.judiciary.senate.gov/press/rep/releases/american-bar-association-judge-barrett-is-well-qualified-to-serve-on-supreme-court

Continue on with Joy Reid.

Member
Posts: 33,928
Joined: Sep 10 2007
Gold: 25.00
Oct 27 2020 09:20am
Quote (Skinned @ Oct 27 2020 11:13am)
Damn. She's actually garbage, lol. Oh well, we wifed it.


Quote (Skinned @ Oct 26 2020 08:05pm)
lol

And Grats ACB. There was no reason not to confirm this justice.


:huh:
Member
Posts: 30,165
Joined: Sep 10 2004
Gold: 0.00
Warn: 30%
Oct 27 2020 09:20am
Quote (Skinned @ 27 Oct 2020 16:13)
Damn. She's actually garbage, lol. Oh well, we wifed it.


her three outstanding qualifying criterias were:

- being a woman
- being extremely conservative and pro corporatism
- not questioning / challenging a single thing the trump admin did

that's literally it. i mean, i'm not trying to say she isn't intelligent or that she's entirely incompetent, but she sure as hell isn't some brilliant legal mind deserving of a SCOTUS nomination based on merit. she's as political a nomination as the court has ever seen.
Member
Posts: 27,048
Joined: Dec 21 2007
Gold: 14,569.69
Oct 27 2020 09:21am
Quote (IgoSoHard @ Oct 27 2020 07:46am)
Intelligent women who thinks for herself & isn’t a (D)

The left: she’s a crazy bitch!



Ha nothing like that. It in her eyes. I’m telling you she’s cracked
Member
Posts: 34,649
Joined: Jul 2 2007
Gold: 273.37
Oct 27 2020 09:22am
Quote (Mangix @ Oct 27 2020 11:18am)
DC can easily be a state. All they do is basically draw a circle around the various state buildings and then turn everything else into a state. We currently have a lot of people who have no representation in Congress. I think they started trying back in like the 60s.


We have a lot of people with no effective representation in Congress.

As I said, why don't we simply cede that land back to Maryland? Why make another tiny state if not specifically for the purposes of increasing Dem numbers in the Senate?

Puerto Rico deserves to be a state, DC does not.
Member
Posts: 57,901
Joined: Dec 3 2008
Gold: 286.00
Oct 27 2020 09:23am
Quote (Mangix @ Oct 27 2020 11:20am)
:huh:


I still see no reason for the GOP to confirm this judge given our system.
Member
Posts: 28,884
Joined: Aug 11 2013
Gold: 10,712.00
Oct 27 2020 09:25am
Quote (thesnipa @ Oct 27 2020 11:15am)
they aren't represented by 1/2 tho. they just dont have the votes. otherwise that logic drops us into places where over half of america isn't represented, and it just a bit of a moot point then.

barriers to representation via votes isnt the same as actual non representation, aka the thing we revolted because of against King George.

but just look at the last few senates and add 2 to democrats, results are world breaking:

115th Congress (2017-2019)
Majority Party: Republican (51 seats)
Minority Party: Democrat (47 seats)
Other Parties: 2 Independents (both caucused with the Democrats)

= gop mandate still

114th Congress (2015-2017)
Majority Party: Republican (54 seats)
Minority Party: Democrat (44 seats)
Other Parties: 2 Independents (both caucused with the Democrats)

= gop mandate still

113th Congress (2013-2015)
Majority Party: Democrat (53 seats)
Minority Party: Republican (45 seats)
Other Parties: 2 Independents (both caucused with the Democrats)

= dnc mandate, no super majority

112th Congress (2011-2013)
Majority Party: Democrat (51 seats)
Minority Party: Republican (47 seats)
Other Parties: 1 Independent; 1 Independent Democrat (both caucused with the Democrats)

= dnc mandate, no super majority

111th Congress (2009-2011)
Majority Party: Democrat (57 seats)
Minority Party: Republican (41 seats)
Other Parties: 1 Independent; 1 Independent Democrat (both caucused with the Democrats)

= dnc mandate, w/ super majority

110th Congress (2007-2009)
Majority Party: Democrat (49 seats)
Minority Party: Republican (49 seats)
Other Parties: 1 Independent; 1 Independent Democrat (both caucused with the Democrats)

= dnc mandate, no super majority

109th Congress (2005-2007)
Majority Party: Republican (55 seats)
Minority Party: Democrat (44 seats)
Other Parties: Independent (1 seat) (caucused with the Democrats)

= gop mandate still




and of course none of this happens in a vaccuum, who knows how many more seats the GOP could muster by fear mongering over a DC swamp takeover of senate and push a few purple states back into the redzone.



To me that breakdown looks fair and you see the senate flipping every few cycles, in the short run +2 votes for D may not be huge given some senate breakdown scenario but think about cases where you literally needed 1-2 votes to flip for something to happen or to fail.

Why upset this fair back and forth by giving one side a guaranteed +2

Fair here is incorporate DC into either Maryland or Virginia and have those Senators represent them
Member
Posts: 33,928
Joined: Sep 10 2007
Gold: 25.00
Oct 27 2020 09:25am
Quote (bogie160 @ Oct 27 2020 11:22am)
We have a lot of people with no effective representation in Congress.

As I said, why don't we simply cede that land back to Maryland? Why make another tiny state if not specifically for the purposes of increasing Dem numbers in the Senate?

Puerto Rico deserves to be a state, DC does not.


For the purposes of increasing dem numbers in the senate.
Member
Posts: 93,001
Joined: Dec 31 2007
Gold: 2,299.94
Oct 27 2020 09:25am
can a single pard armchair lawyer name a potential nominee with even close to the qualifications RBG had that is starkly different than what ACB has?

and further how should a scotus pick's qualifications be measured with regards to teaching law, specifically constitutional or federal law classes at Ivy league or similar schools? as compared to being say an appellate lawyer in the state or federal system.

This post was edited by thesnipa on Oct 27 2020 09:26am
Member
Posts: 57,901
Joined: Dec 3 2008
Gold: 286.00
Oct 27 2020 09:27am
Quote (thesnipa @ Oct 27 2020 11:25am)
can a single pard armchair lawyer name a potential nominee with even close to the qualifications RBG had that is starkly different than what ACB has?

and further how should a scotus pick's qualifications be measured with regards to teaching law, specifically constitutional or federal law classes at Ivy league or similar schools? as compared to being say an appellate lawyer in the state or federal system.


Richard Posner.

He was featured a lot in my philosophy of law class.

This post was edited by Skinned on Oct 27 2020 09:28am
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev1323334353646Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll