Quote (ferdia @ 11 Aug 2023 03:33)
i disagree with this, it just needs the united states, ukraine and russia. europe is irrelevant of course, and so is everyone else. As i stated on numerous occasions there can be no peace without the US brokering it, since they are the main uhhh, party. (replace party with whatever word you want, you get my drift).
I gave it some thoughts.
If that is the case that will be no peace or ceasefire. The Foreign Policy Establishment which Biden is part of,
especially during the 90s is hell bent on wiping out the Russians influence once and for all especially militarily.The script was already discussed , written and prepared since the fall of the Soviet Union.
This is a coherent and reasonable strategy at that point at least for some in the
FPE. It is a way for the US / West to finally push a liberal style system to that part of the world.
Insights from Francis Fukuyama for my above statement,
The End of History and the Last Man Published in 1992.
A short summary and counter arguments can be seen here.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_End_of_History_and_the_Last_ManNow this is my opinion, all the proxy wars, wars (
There are definitely Humanitarian intervention in a number of them no doubt out of compassion or justice however one wants to frame it. ) etc etc that happened after the the fall of the Soviets seems to be a litmus test to see how influential and robust the Russians are, culminating up to the current Ukraine drama.
And this particular Foreign Policy Script is Bi-Partisan. I don't see how United States is the only party that is needed to broker the peace. Pressure from other players needed to be involved to broker the peace no matter how big or small.
But that is just how I look at it.
Will appreciate and value your input.
This post was edited by Hamsterbaby on Aug 10 2023 02:19pm